Species abundance distributions, statistical mechanics and the priors of MaxEnt.

The methods of Maximum Entropy have been deployed for some years to address the problem of species abundance distributions. In this approach, it is important to identify the correct weighting factors, or priors, to be applied before maximising the entropy function subject to constraints. The forms of such priors depend not only on the exact problem but can also depend on the way it is set up; priors are determined by the underlying dynamics of the complex system under consideration. The problem is one of statistical mechanics and it is the properties of the system that yield the correct MaxEnt priors, appropriate to the way the problem is framed. Here I calculate, in several different ways, the species abundance distribution resulting when individuals in a community are born and die independently. In the usual formulation the prior distribution for the number of species over the number of individuals is 1/n; the problem can be reformulated in terms of the distribution of individuals over species classes, with a uniform prior. Results are obtained using master equations for the dynamics and separately through the combinatoric methods of elementary statistical mechanics; the MaxEnt priors then emerge a posteriori. The first object is to establish the log series species abundance distribution as the outcome of per capita guild dynamics. The second is to clarify the true nature and origin of priors in the language of MaxEnt. Finally, I consider how it may come about that the distribution is similar to log series in the event that filled niches dominate species abundance. For the general ecologist, there are two messages. First, that species abundance distributions are determined largely by population sorting through fractional processes (resulting in the 1/n factor) and secondly that useful information is likely to be found only in departures from the log series. For the MaxEnt practitioner, the message is that the prior with respect to which the entropy is to be maximised is determined by the nature of the problem and the way in which it is formulated.

[1]  Robert M. May,et al.  Lifting the veil on abundance patterns , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  G. Sugihara Minimal Community Structure: An Explanation of Species Abundance Patterns , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Salvador Pueyo,et al.  The maximum entropy formalism and the idiosyncratic theory of biodiversity , 2007, Ecology letters.

[4]  Fractional abundance and the ecology of community structure , 2010, 1008.2527.

[5]  Virginia Held,et al.  Birth and Death , 1989, Ethics.

[6]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[7]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence , 2010 .

[8]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology , 2003, Nature.

[9]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[10]  F. W. Preston The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I , 1962 .

[11]  O. Pybus,et al.  Phylogeny, niches, and relative abundance in natural communities. , 2008, Ecology.

[12]  M. Bulmer On Fitting the Poisson Lognormal Distribution to Species-Abundance Data , 1974 .

[13]  M. Lomas,et al.  The statistical mechanics of community assembly and species distribution. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[14]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Bowler,et al.  On the statistical mechanics of species abundance distributions. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  D. Kendall On the Generalized "Birth-and-Death" Process , 1948 .

[17]  R. May,et al.  Predicted correspondence between species abundances and dendrograms of niche similarities , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. L. Koch,et al.  Competitive coexistence of two predators utilizing the same prey under constant environmental conditions. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Salvador Pueyo,et al.  Diversity : between neutrality and structure , 2006 .

[20]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests , 2005, Nature.

[21]  M. Bowler,et al.  The general theory of species abundance distributions , 2010, 1002.5008.

[22]  E. Jaynes Probability theory : the logic of science , 2003 .

[23]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Mutsunori Tokeshi,et al.  NICHE APPORTIONMENT OR RANDOM ASSORTMENT: SPECIES ABUNDANCE PATTERNS REVISITED , 1990 .

[25]  M. Tokeshi Power fraction: A new explanation of relative abundance patterns in species-rich assemblages , 1996 .

[26]  R. Margalef,et al.  Information theory in ecology , 1958 .

[27]  F. W. Preston The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species , 1948 .

[28]  A. L. Koch,et al.  Coexistence resulting from an alternation of density dependent and density independent growth. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  D. Kendall,et al.  On some modes of population growth leading to R. A. Fisher's logarithmic series distribution. , 1948, Biometrika.

[30]  Ryan A Chisholm,et al.  Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Macarthur ON THE RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF BIRD SPECIES. , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  A. Maritan,et al.  Applications of the principle of maximum entropy: from physics to ecology , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[33]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On the Relative Abundance of Species , 1960, The American Naturalist.