Representations and Visual Synthesis in Engineering Design

Background Engineers who engage with innovation and design rely on cooperation and knowledge sharing across multiple disciplines. However, the traditional engineering curriculum promotes and emphasizes engineering sciences and monodisciplinary skills and gives less priority to important collaborative skills such as sketching and visualization. Purpose This article addresses how students engage with engineering design challenges and use visual representations to develop and integrate recognitions. Our study explores how technical, analytical disciplinary competences are combined with those of qualitative, ethnographic user studies. Design/Method Through a qualitative field study and an analysis of a collection of representations produced during a design process by a team of engineering students, the role of representations in the early stages of collaborative engineering design is explored. After reassembling the representations according to dates and themes, we deployed various perspectives from science and technology studies and engineering studies to assess the students' epistemic journey. Results Representations not only communicate findings but also incorporate analysis in their creation, and facilitate what we call collaborative design synthesis. Successful representations present and organize recognitions so that they are recognizable across other disciplines and can be integrated into new recognitions. Representations therefore shape the collaborative base of the design process and emphasize the important competences that can produce them. Conclusions The analysis shows that collaborative design synthesis is an epistemology consisting of (1) exploration, (2) inscription, (3) collection, and (4) combining and refining. The important ability of representations to draw together is termed transferability, and the competence to produce them, disciplinary mastery.

[1]  W. Kline,et al.  World War II: a watershed in electrical engineering education , 1994, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[2]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences , 2011 .

[3]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[4]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Framework for improving engineering representational literacy by using pen-based computing , 2011 .

[5]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[6]  Jennifer M. Case,et al.  Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research , 2011 .

[7]  Kathryn Henderson The Political Career of a Prototype: Visual Representation in Design Engineering , 1995 .

[8]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[10]  Ulrik Jørgensen,et al.  Entrepreneurship and response strategies to challenges in engineering and design education , 2012 .

[11]  Claus Thorp Hansen,et al.  The Engineering Designer's Perception of Work Sheets , 2000 .

[12]  Ulrik Jørgensen,et al.  Foundations for a new type of design-engineers – experiences from DTU meeting the CDIO concept , 2011 .

[13]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. , 2001 .

[14]  Jennifer M. Case,et al.  Emerging Methodologies in Engineering Education Research , 2011 .