Impact of Excessive Journal Self-Citations: A Case Study on the Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica Journal

There is an increasing trend towards assessing the scientific performance of researchers and institutions of higher learning in the form of journal publications and the associated citations. Currently, the journal impact factor (JIF) value is the most widely used measure for any academic contents. However, there are growing concerns for the unethical practices adopted by journal editors to manipulate the JIF computations. Recently, a Swiss journal, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica which has a JIF value of 0.655 in the year 2006 registers a remarkable JIF increment (of 119%) to 1.439 in the year 2007. It is believed that the journal can achieve such a prominent JIF improvement by publishing a single editorial article that self-cited 66 of its own articles published either in the year 2005 or 2006. The journal has been revoked of any JIF value in the following year of 2008. Thus, it is interesting to review the possible alternative bibliographical trend for the journal should the self-cite event has been avoided, the circumstances leading to the decision by the editor to publish such an article and the possible ethical implications or lessons that can be derived from this incident.

[1]  D. Christakis,et al.  Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[2]  G. Rolfe,et al.  PhD by publication: a prospective as well as retrospective award? Some subversive thoughts. , 2009, Nurse education today.

[3]  David Adam,et al.  Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.

[4]  A report card for journals. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Self-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Author self-citation in the diabetes literature , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  A. Paraskeva,et al.  Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination , 2002, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  T. Liesegang,et al.  Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  Hannah Brown,et al.  How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  G Walter,et al.  The Impact Factor: Time for Change , 2001, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[12]  Martin Schumacher,et al.  The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[13]  E. Garfield.  Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Jong Yong Abdiel Foo,et al.  The Retrospective Analysis of Bibliographical Trends for Nine Biomedical Engineering Journals from 1999 to 2007 , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Richard Smith,et al.  Journal accused of manipulating impact factor , 1997 .

[16]  A. Skjennald,et al.  Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Andrew P Kurmis,et al.  Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  H. K. Schutte,et al.  Reaction of Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica on the Current Trend of Impact Factor Measures , 2007, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[19]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Should we ditch impact factors? , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Nimish Vakil.  The Journal Impact Factor: Judging a Book by Its Cover , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[22]  Mabel Chew,et al.  Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[23]  Ana Marusic,et al.  Calculating Impact Factor: How Bibliographical Classification of Journal Items Affects the Impact Factor of Large and Small Journals , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[24]  A. Paraskeva,et al.  Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  S. Bloch,et al.  Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[26]  M. C. Atlas.  Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[27]  J. Merz,et al.  Research Misconduct Policies of High Impact Biomedical Journals , 2006, Accountability in research.

[28]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[29]  Kirby P. Lee,et al.  Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. , 2002, JAMA.

[30]  R. Wears,et al.  Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. , 2002, JAMA.