Possibilities and sustainability of “biomass for power” solutions in the case of a coal-based power utility

This paper investigates the possibilities and the sustainability of “biomass for power” solutions on a real power system. The case example is JP Elektroprivreda BiH d.d.—Sarajevo (EPBiH), a typical conventional coal-based power utility operating in the region of South East Europe. Biomass use is one of the solutions considered in EPBiH as a means of increasing shares of renewable energy sources (RES) in final energy production and reducing CO2 emissions. This ultimately is a requirement for all conventional coal-based power utilities on track to meet their greenhouse gas (GHG) cut targets by 2050. The paper offers a discussion of possible options as a function of sustainability principles, considering environmental, economic and social aspects of biomass use. In the case of EPBiH, the most beneficial would be waste woody biomass and energy crop co-firing on existing coal-based power plants, as suggested by biomass market analyses and associated technological studies. To assess the sustainability of the different biomass co-firing options, a multicriteria sustainability assessment (MSA) and single criteria analysis (SCA) were used. Four different options were considered, based on different ratios of biomass for co-firing: 0 wt%-reference case, and 5, 7 and 10 wt% of biomass. Both the MSA and the SCA confirmed that the option with the highest share of biomass is the most preferable one for the considered case. In addition to that, the CO2 parameter proved to be a key sustainability indicator, effecting the most decision making with regard to preference of options from the point of sustainability. Following up on the results of the analyses, the long-term projection of biomass use in EPBiH has shown an increase in biomass utilization of up to 450,000 t/y in 2030 and beyond, with associated CO2 cuts of up to 395,000 t/y. This resulted in a 4 % CO2 cut achieved with biomass co-firing, compared to the 1990 CO2 emission level. It should be noted that the proposed assessment model for biomass use may be applied to any conventional coal-based power utility as an option in contributing to meeting specific CO2 cut targets, provided that the set of input data is available and reliable.

[1]  Lin Ma,et al.  Pollutants from the combustion of solid biomass fuels , 2012 .

[2]  Gongliang Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the combustion behaviour and ash characteristics of biomass waste derived fuels, pine and coal in a drop tube furnace , 2014 .

[3]  Anes Kazagic,et al.  Influence of multiple air staging and reburning on NOx emissions during co-firing of low rank brown coal with woody biomass and natural gas , 2016 .

[4]  Fernando Sebastián,et al.  Large-scale analysis of GHG (greenhouse gas) reduction by means of biomass co-firing at country-scale: Application to the Spanish case , 2012 .

[5]  Borislav Grubor,et al.  Mapping the potential for decentralized energy generation based on RES in Western Balkans , 2005 .

[6]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[7]  Dingtao Zhao,et al.  Carbon pricing and electricity market reforms in China , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[8]  Roman Weber,et al.  Investigation of ash deposit formation during co-firing of coal with sewage sludge, saw-dust and refuse derived fuel , 2008 .

[9]  Anes Kazagic,et al.  Synergy effects of co-firing wooden biomass with Bosnian coal , 2009 .

[10]  Anes Kazagic,et al.  Experimental investigation of ash behavior and emissions during combustion of Bosnian coal and biomass , 2007 .

[11]  Mustafa Music,et al.  Power utility generation portfolio optimization as function of specific RES and decarbonisation targets – EPBiH case study ☆ , 2014 .

[12]  Anes Kazagic,et al.  Multi-criteria sustainability assessment: A tool for evaluation of new energy system , 2007 .

[13]  Neven Duić,et al.  Numerical study of co-firing pulverized coal and biomass inside a cement calciner , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[14]  J. Klemeš,et al.  Environmental policy decision-making support tools and pollution reduction technologies: a summary , 2010 .

[15]  Rebecca S. Dodder,et al.  Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[16]  Nilay Shah,et al.  BVCM: A comprehensive and flexible toolkit for whole system biomass value chain analysis and optimisation – Mathematical formulation , 2015 .

[17]  Tania Urmee,et al.  Sustainable electricity generation from oil palm biomass wastes in Malaysia: An industry survey , 2014 .

[18]  Mohamed Pourkashanian,et al.  Combustion of pulverised coal and biomass , 2001 .

[19]  Bo G Leckner,et al.  Co-combustion - A summary of technology , 2007 .