The Analysis of Methadone Clinic Data Using Marginal and Conditional Logistic Models with Mixture or Random Effects

Summary The paper develops methods for the statistical analysis of outcomes of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Subjects for this study were a cohort of patients entering MMT in Sydney in 1986. Urine drug tests on these subjects were performed weekly during MMT, and were reported as either positive or negative for morphine, the marker of recent heroin use. To allow correlation between the repeated binary measurements, a marginal logistic model was fitted using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach and the alternating logistic regression approach. Conditional logistic models are also considered. Results of separate fitting to each patient and score tests suggest that there is substantial between-patient variation in response to MMT. To account for the population heterogeneity and to facilitate subject-specific inference, the conditional logistic model is extended by introducing random intercepts. The two, three and four group mixture models are also investigated. The model of best fit is a three group mixture model, in which about a quarter of the subjects have a poor response to MMT, with continued heroin use independent of daily dose of methadone; about a quarter of the subjects have a very good response, with little or no heroin use, again independent of dose; and about half the subjects responded in a dose-dependent fashion, with reduced heroin use while receiving higher doses of methadone. These findings are consistent with clinical experience. There is also an association between reduced drug use and increased duration in treatment. The mixture model is recommended since it is quite tractable in terms of estimation and model selection as well as being supported by clinical experience.

[1]  S. Zeger,et al.  Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data , 1992 .

[2]  Alan Ross,et al.  The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Patients, Programs, Services, and Outcome , 1991 .

[3]  T. Vaughn,et al.  Variations in methadone treatment practices. Results from a national study. , 1992, JAMA.

[4]  W. Hall,et al.  Key issues in methadone maintenance treatment , 1992 .

[5]  C. Mcgilchrist Estimation in Generalized Mixed Models , 1994 .

[6]  Test of homogeneity. , 1996, Biometrics.

[7]  W. Hargreaves Methadone dosage and duration for maintenance treatment.: (468222004-001) , 1983 .

[8]  G. Bonney,et al.  Logistic regression for dependent binary observations. , 1987, Biometrics.

[9]  G. Stimson The fourth Okey memorial lecture. AIDS and HIV: the challenge for British drug services. , 1990, British journal of addiction.

[10]  N. Laird,et al.  A likelihood-based method for analysing longitudinal binary responses , 1993 .

[11]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[12]  Garrett M. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Logistic Regression Models for Binary Panel Data with Attrition , 1996 .

[13]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Regression Models for Longitudinal Binary Responses with Informative Drop‐Outs , 1995 .

[14]  D. Follmann,et al.  An approximate generalized linear model with random effects for informative missing data. , 1995, Biometrics.

[15]  L. Poretsky,et al.  Absence of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus in long-term, socially rehabilitated methadone maintenance patients. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  Alan Ross,et al.  The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment , 1991, Springer New York.

[17]  D. Commenges,et al.  Test of homogeneity of binary data with explanatory variables. , 1994, Biometrics.

[18]  L. Zhao,et al.  Correlated binary regression using a quadratic exponential model , 1990 .

[19]  Andrea Rotnitzky,et al.  Regression Models for Discrete Longitudinal Responses , 1993 .

[20]  P. Diggle,et al.  Modelling multivariate binary data with alternating logistic regressions , 1993 .