Numerical experiments with rubble piles: equilibrium shapes and spins

Abstract We present numerical experiments investigating the shape and spin limits of self-gravitating “perfect” rubble piles that consist of identical, smooth, rigid, spherical particles with configurable normal coefficient of restitution and no sliding friction. Such constructs are currently employed in a variety of investigations, ranging from the formation of asteroid satellites to the dynamical properties of Saturn's densest rings. We find that, owing to cannonball stacking behavior, rubble piles can maintain non-spherical shapes without bulk spin, unlike a fluid, and can spin faster than a perfect fluid before shedding mass, consistent with the theory for the more general continuum rubble pile model (Holsapple, 2004, Icarus 172, 272–303). Rubble piles that reassemble following a catastrophic disruption reconfigure themselves to lie within stability limits predicted by the continuum theory. We also find that coarse configurations consisting of a small number of particles are more resistant to tidal disruption than fine configurations with many particles. Overall this study shows that idealized rubble piles behave qualitatively in a manner similar to certain granular materials, at least in the limit where global shape readjustments and/or mass shedding begins. The limits obtained here may provide constraints on the possible internal structure of some small Solar System bodies that have extreme shapes or are under high stress. Amalthea is presented as a case study.

[1]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Catastrophic disruption of asteroids and family formation: a review of numerical simulations including both fragmentation and gravitational reaccumulations , 2004 .

[2]  1620 Geographos and 433 Eros: Shaped by Planetary Tides , 1998, astro-ph/9812235.

[3]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  Evolution of NEO rotation rates due to close encounters with Earth and Venus , 2003 .

[4]  D. Korycansky Orbital dynamics for rigid bodies , 2003 .

[5]  F. Roig,et al.  Interacting ellipsoids: a minimal model for the dynamics of rubble-pile bodies , 2003 .

[6]  Petr Pravec,et al.  Fast and Slow Rotation of Asteroids , 2000 .

[7]  D. Scheeres,et al.  Energy and Stress Distributions in Ellipsoids , 2002 .

[8]  K. Holsapple Equilibrium figures of spinning bodies with self-gravity , 2004 .

[9]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  The formation of asteroid satellites in large impacts: Results from numerical simulations , 2004 .

[10]  Keith A. Holsapple,et al.  Equilibrium Configurations of Solid Cohesionless Bodies , 2001 .

[11]  Z. Leinhardt,et al.  N-body simulations of planetesimal evolution: Effect of varying impactor mass ratio , 2001 .

[12]  Gravitational instability and clustering in a disk of planetesimals , 2004, astro-ph/0408441.

[13]  George Lake,et al.  Direct Large-Scale N-Body Simulations of Planetesimal Dynamics , 2000 .

[14]  P. Farinella,et al.  Triaxial equilibrium ellipsoids among the asteroids , 1981 .

[15]  S. Ostro,et al.  Effects of Gravitational Interactions on Asteroid Spin States , 2000 .

[16]  Young,et al.  Dynamics of a freely evolving, two-dimensional granular medium. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[17]  S. Love,et al.  Tidal Distortion and Disruption of Earth-Crossing Asteroids , 1997 .

[19]  H. Melosh,et al.  Gravitational Aggregates: Evidence and Evolution , 2002 .

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  MAXIMUM ANGLE OF STABILITY IN WET AND DRY SPHERICAL GRANULAR MEDIA , 1997 .

[21]  D. Vokrouhlický,et al.  The Effect of Yarkovsky Thermal Forces on the Dynamical Evolution of Asteroids and Meteoroids , 2002 .

[22]  K. Holsapple Could fast rotator asteroids be rubble piles , 2003 .

[23]  A. Barabasi,et al.  What keeps sandcastles standing? , 1997, Nature.

[24]  W. Benz,et al.  Density of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 deduced by modelling breakup of the parent 'rubble pile' , 1994, Nature.

[25]  Alan W. Harris,et al.  The Rotation Rates of Very Small Asteroids: Evidence for Rubble-Pile Structure , 1996 .

[26]  W. Benz,et al.  Disruption of kilometre-sized asteroids by energetic collisions , 1998, Nature.

[27]  T. Teichmann,et al.  Fundamentals of celestial mechanics , 1963 .

[28]  M. Hénon,et al.  A numerical simulation of planetary rings. I: Binary encounters , 1987 .

[29]  S. Weidenschilling How fast can an asteroid spin , 1980 .

[30]  J. Stadel Cosmological N-body simulations and their analysis , 2001 .

[31]  On the Slow Rotation of Asteroids , 2002 .

[32]  D. Richardson,et al.  A Self-Consistent Numerical Treatment of Fractal Aggregate Dynamics , 1995 .

[33]  Side effects of collisions: Spin Rate Changes, Tumbling Rotation States, and Binary Asteroids , 2002 .