High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome

Mutations have pivotal functions in the onset of genetic diseases and are the fundamental substrate for evolution. However, present estimates of the spontaneous mutation rate and spectrum are derived from indirect and biased measurements. For instance, mutation rate estimates for Caenorhabditis elegans are extrapolated from observations on a few genetic loci with visible phenotypes and vary over an order of magnitude. Alternative approaches in mammals, relying on phylogenetic comparisons of pseudogene loci and fourfold degenerate codon positions, suffer from uncertainties in the actual number of generations separating the compared species and the inability to exclude biases associated with natural selection. Here we provide a direct and unbiased estimate of the nuclear mutation rate and its molecular spectrum with a set of C. elegans mutation-accumulation lines that reveal a mutation rate about tenfold higher than previous indirect estimates and an excess of insertions over deletions. Because deletions dominate patterns of C. elegans pseudogene variation, our observations indicate that natural selection might be significant in promoting small genome size, and challenge the prevalent assumption that pseudogene divergence accurately reflects the spontaneous mutation spectrum.

[1]  M. Nachman,et al.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. , 2000, Genetics.

[2]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[4]  J. Thompson,et al.  Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[5]  Kristin C. Gunsalus,et al.  RNAiDB and PhenoBlast: web tools for genome-wide phenotypic mapping projects , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Lynch,et al.  The Origins of Genome Complexity , 2003, Science.

[8]  P. Richterich,et al.  Estimation of errors in "raw" DNA sequences: a validation study. , 1998, Genome research.

[9]  G. B. Pollock,et al.  Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  R. Crozier GENETIC CLONAL RECOGNITION ABILITIES IN MARINE INVERTEBRATES MUST BE MAINTAINED BY SELECTION FOR SOMETHING ELSE , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  R. Durbin,et al.  The Genome Sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A Platform for Comparative Genomics , 2003, PLoS biology.

[12]  D. Queller,et al.  Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  A. Griffin,et al.  Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Y. Cruz A sterile defender morph in a polyembryonic hymenopterous parasite , 1981, Nature.

[15]  Atsushi Yoshiki,et al.  An expressed pseudogene regulates the messenger-RNA stability of its homologous coding gene , 2003, Nature.

[16]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Mutation rates in mammalian genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Lynch,et al.  High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Science.

[18]  D. Queller,et al.  Genetic relatedness in viscous populations , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[19]  Joseph M. Dale,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Transcriptional Activity in the Arabidopsis Genome , 2003, Science.

[20]  D. Petrov,et al.  Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome. , 2000, The Journal of heredity.

[21]  F. Ayala,et al.  Pseudogenes: are they "junk" or functional DNA? , 2003, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  A. D. Peters,et al.  High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1999, Science.

[23]  Patrick Abbot,et al.  Genetic conflict and conditional altruism in social aphid colonies , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Grbic,et al.  The development and evolution of polyembryonic insects. , 1997, Current topics in developmental biology.

[25]  T J Gibson,et al.  An estimate of large‐scale sequencing accuracy , 2000, EMBO reports.

[26]  M. Strand,et al.  Sibling rivalry and brood sex ratios in polyembryonic wasps , 1992, Nature.

[27]  M. Lynch,et al.  THE FITNESS EFFECTS OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONS IN CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  R. Grosberg The Evolution of Allorecognition Specificity in Clonal Invertebrates , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  P. Taylor Altruism in viscous populations — an inclusive fitness model , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[30]  Jason E Stajich,et al.  The effects of selection against spurious transcription factor binding sites. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  Avinash Kewalramani,et al.  Abundance, Distribution, and Mutation Rates of Homopolymeric Nucleotide Runs in the Genome of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[32]  P. Keightley,et al.  EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1998, Genetics.

[33]  M. Strand,et al.  Caste determination in a polyembryonic wasp involves inheritance of germ cells. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Howard Ochman,et al.  Neutral mutations and neutral substitutions in bacterial genomes. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  The changing sizes of genes , 1996, Nature.

[36]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives , 2002, Science.

[37]  D. Petrov,et al.  High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila , 1996, Nature.

[38]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[39]  M. Strand Development of the polyembryonic parasitoid Copidosoma floridanum in Trichoplusia ni , 1989 .

[40]  A Levitt,et al.  Molecular and genomic organization of clusters of repetitive DNA sequences in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Hugh M. Robertson,et al.  Neutral Evolution of Ten Types of mariner Transposons in the Genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[42]  M. Strand,et al.  Progeny and sex allocation decisions of the polyembryonic wasp Copidosoma floridanum. , 1995 .

[43]  H. Robertson,et al.  The large srh family of chemoreceptor genes in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals processes of genome evolution involving large duplications and deletions and intron gains and losses. , 2000, Genome research.

[44]  C. Langley,et al.  Spontaneous mutability in Drosophila melanogaster, in natural and laboratory environments. , 1976, Mutation research.

[45]  Jeffrey A. Harvey,et al.  Competition induces adaptive shifts in caste ratios of a polyembryonic wasp , 2000, Nature.

[46]  L. Duret,et al.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Genotype—environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  W Kelley Thomas,et al.  Phylogenetics in Caenorhabditis elegans: an analysis of divergence and outcrossing. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  M. Strand,et al.  Host resistance and the evolution of kin recognition in polyembryonic wasps , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  M. Strand Oviposition behavior and progeny allocation of the polyembryonic waspCopidosoma floridanum (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.