Purpose X-ray fluoroscopy guidance is frequently used in medical interventions. Image-guided interventional procedures that employ localization for registration require accurate information about the C-arm’s rotation angle that provides the data externally in real time. Optical, electromagnetic, and image-based pose tracking systems have limited convenience and accuracy. An alternative method to recover C-arm orientation was developed using an accelerometer as tilt sensor.Methods The fluoroscopic C-arm’s orientation was estimated using a tri-axial acceleration sensor mounted on the X-ray detector as a tilt sensor. When the C-arm is stationary, the measured acceleration direction corresponds to the gravitational force direction. The accelerometer was calibrated with respect to the C-arm’s rotation along its two axes, using a high-accuracy optical tracker as a reference. The scaling and offset error of the sensor was compensated using polynomial fitting. The system was evaluated on a GE OEC 9800 C-arm. Results obtained by accelerometer, built-in sensor, and image-based tracking were compared, using optical tracking as ground truth data.Results The accelerometer-based orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was $$-0.1\pm 0.0^{\circ }$$-0.1±0.0∘ and for secondary angle rotation it was $$0.1\pm 0.0^{\circ }$$0.1±0.0∘. The built-in sensor orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was $$-0.1\pm 0.2^{\circ }$$-0.1±0.2∘, and for secondary angle rotation it was $$0.1\pm 0.2^{\circ }$$0.1±0.2∘. The image-based orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was $$-0.1\pm 1.3^{\circ }$$-0.1±1.3∘, and for secondary angle rotation it was $$-1.3\pm 0.3^{\circ }$$-1.3±0.3∘.Conclusion The accelerometer provided better results than the built-in sensor and image-based tracking. The accelerometer sensor is small, inexpensive, covers the full rotation range of the C-arm, does not require line of sight, and can be easily installed to any mobile X-ray machine. Therefore, accelerometer tilt sensing is a very promising applicant for orientation angle tracking of C-arm fluoroscopes.
[1]
Gabor Fichtinger,et al.
REDMAPS: Reduced-Dimensionality Matching for Prostate Brachytherapy Seed Reconstruction
,
2011,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[2]
K. Cleary,et al.
Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications.
,
2010,
Annual review of biomedical engineering.
[3]
Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.
Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking in clinical routine using multiple or adjacent sensors
,
2013,
The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.
[4]
Gabor Fichtinger,et al.
C-arm rotation encoding with accelerometers
,
2010,
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.
[5]
K. Cleary,et al.
Image Guided Interventions.
,
2020,
Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.
[6]
Gabor Fichtinger,et al.
CTREC: C-arm tracking and reconstruction using elliptic curves
,
2008,
2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.
[7]
Ameet K. Jain,et al.
FTRAC--a robust fluoroscope tracking fiducial.
,
2005,
Medical physics.
[8]
Gabor Fichtinger,et al.
Prostate implant reconstruction from C-arm images with motion-compensated tomosynthesis.
,
2011,
Medical physics.
[9]
A Gueziec,et al.
A C-arm fluoroscopy-guided progressive cut refinement strategy using a surgical robot.
,
2000,
Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.