Assessment of n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient: When Is the Assessment Reliable?

A model, VLOGP, has been developed for assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient, log P, of chemicals from their structures. Unlike group contribution methods, VLOGP is based on linear free energy relationship (LFER) approach and employs information-rich electrotopological structure quantifiers derived solely from molecular topology. VLOGP, a robust and cross-validated model derived from accurately measured experimental log P values of 6675 diverse chemicals, has a coefficient of determination, R2, of 0.986 and a standard error of estimate of 0.20. When applied to the training set, the largest deviation observed between experimental and calculated log P was 0.42. VLOGP is different from other log P predictors in that its application domain, called Optimum Prediction Space (OPS), has been quantitatively defined, i.e., structures to which the model should not be applied for predicting log P can be identified. A computer-assisted implementation of this model within HDi's toxicity assessment software package, TOPKAT 3.0, automatically checks whether the submitted structure is inside the OPS or not. VLOGP was applied to a set of 113 chemicals not included in the training set. It was observed that for the structures inside the OPS the average deviation between experimental and model-calculated log P values is 0.27, whereas the corresponding deviation for structures outside the OPS is 1.35. This demonstrates the necessity of identifying the structures to which a model is not applicable before accepting a model-based predicted log P value. For a set of 47 nucleosides, the performance of VLOGP was compared with that of four published log P predictors; a standard deviation of 0.33 was obtained with VLOGP, whereas the standard deviation from other log P predictors ranged between 0.46 and 1.20.

[1]  Y Sasaki,et al.  Prediction of octanol/water partition coefficients using parameters derived from molecular structures. , 1991, Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics.

[2]  Hideaki Umeyama,et al.  The Study of Partition Coefficients. The Prediction of Log P Value Based on Molecular Structure , 1988 .

[3]  Robert O. Kan A Correlation of Chemical Shifts with Inductive Effect Parameters , 1964 .

[4]  L B Kier,et al.  Molecular connectivity. 6. Examination of the parabolic relationship between molecular connectivity and biological activity. , 1976, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Richard S.H. Mah,et al.  Evaluation of schemes for detecting and identifying gross errors in process data , 1987 .

[6]  D. J. Polton,et al.  A comment on nomenclature and the unsaturated bond , 1991, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[7]  R. Collander,et al.  Permeability of Plant Cells , 1957 .

[8]  A. Leo,et al.  Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology , 1979 .

[9]  L. Kier Distinguishing Atom Differences in a Molecular Graph Shape Index , 1986 .

[10]  C. Hansch,et al.  Linear free-energy relationship between partition coefficients and the aqueous solubility of organic liquids , 1968 .

[11]  M. Rami Reddy,et al.  Assessment of methods used for predicting lipophilicity: Application to nucleosides and nucleoside bases , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  A. Hopfinger,et al.  Application of SCAP to drug design. 1. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients using solvent-dependent conformational analyses. , 1976, Journal of medicinal chemistry.