Use of Silicone Materials to Simulate Tissue Biomechanics as Related to Deep Tissue Injury

OBJECTIVE: Deep tissue injury (DTI) is caused by prolonged mechanical loading that disrupts blood flow and metabolic clearance. A patient simulator that mimics the biomechanical aspects of DTI initiation, stress and strain in deep muscle tissue, would be potentially useful as a training tool for pressure-relief techniques and testing platform for pressure-mitigating products. As a step toward this goal, this study evaluates the ability of silicone materials to mimic the distribution of stress in muscle tissue under concentrated loading. METHODS: To quantify the mechanical properties of candidate silicone materials, unconfined compression experiments were conducted on 3 silicone formulations (Ecoflex 0030, Ecoflex 0010, and Dragon Skin; Smooth-On, Inc, Easton, Pennsylvania). Results were fit to an Ogden hyperelastic material model, and the resulting shear moduli (G) were compared with published values for biological tissues. Indentation tests were then conducted on Ecoflex 0030 and porcine muscle to investigate silicone’s ability to mimic the nonuniform stress distribution muscle demonstrates under concentrated loading. Finite element models were created to quantify stresses throughout tissue depth. Finally, a preliminary patient simulator prototype was constructed, and both deep and superficial “tissue” pressures were recorded to examine stress distribution. RESULTS: Indentation tests showed similar stress distribution trends in muscle and Ecoflex 0030, but stress magnitudes were higher in Ecoflex 0030 than in porcine muscle. All 3 silicone formulations demonstrated shear moduli within the range of published values for biological tissue. For the experimental conditions reported in this work, Ecoflex 0030 exhibited greater stiffness than porcine muscle. CONCLUSION: Indentation tests and the prototype patient simulator trial demonstrated similar trends with high pressures closest to the bony prominence with decreasing magnitude toward the interfacial surface. Qualitatively, silicone mimicked the phenomenon observed in muscle of nonuniform stress under concentrated loading. Although shear moduli were within biological ranges, stress and stiffness values exceeded those of porcine muscle. This research represents a first step toward development of a preclinical model simulating the biomechanical conditions of stress and strain in deep muscle, since local biomechanical factors are acknowledged to play a role in DTI initiation. Future research is needed to refine the capacity of preclinical models to simulate biomechanical parameters in successive tissue layers of muscle, fat, dermis, and epidermis typically intervening between bone and support surfaces, for body regions at risk for DTI.

[1]  N P Reddy,et al.  Stress distribution in a physical buttock model: effect of simulated bone geometry. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Chris Khoo Pressure Ulcer Research: Current and Future Perspectives , 2015 .

[3]  C. Oomens,et al.  The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound? , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Larry Press,et al.  Reliability of Bench Tests of Interface Pressure , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[5]  R. Vargiolu,et al.  Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests , 2009, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[6]  Benjamin J. Ellis,et al.  Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics , 2007, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[7]  A. Gefen,et al.  Pressure-time cell death threshold for albino rat skeletal muscles as related to pressure sore biomechanics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Amit Gefen,et al.  Bioengineering Models of Deep Tissue Injury , 2008, Advances in skin & wound care.

[9]  Oliver A. Shergold,et al.  The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates , 2006 .

[10]  M R Drost,et al.  Passive transverse mechanical properties of skeletal muscle under in vivo compression. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. S. Dharmarajan,et al.  Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Features and Management , 2002 .

[12]  O. Lee,et al.  Dynamic Deformation Behavior of Rubber under High Strain Rate Compressive Loading , 2003 .

[13]  Ren G Dong,et al.  Simultaneous determination of the nonlinear‐elastic properties of skin and subcutaneous tissue in unconfined compression tests , 2007, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[14]  V Allen,et al.  Repeatability of subject/bed interface pressure measurements. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[15]  G V Cochran,et al.  Model experiments to study the stress distributions in a seated buttock. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  M. Huggins Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. , 1961 .

[17]  G. H. Rose,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of skeletal muscle , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  David R. Thomas,et al.  Assessment and management of chronic pressure ulcers in the elderly. , 2006, The Medical clinics of North America.

[19]  M. Boyce,et al.  Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: A review , 2000 .

[20]  J. Vidal,et al.  An analysis of the diverse factors concerned with the development of pressure sores in spinal cord injured patients , 1991, Paraplegia.

[21]  Lilian Lacourpaille,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging provides a reliable measurement of resting muscle shear elastic modulus , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[22]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Assessment of mechanical conditions in sub-dermal tissues during sitting: a combined experimental-MRI and finite element approach. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  G. Baroud,et al.  Material properties of the human calcaneal fat pad in compression: experiment and theory. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  M. Patrick,et al.  A National Study of Pressure Ulcer Prevalence and Incidence in Acute Care Hospitals , 2000, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[25]  A Gefen,et al.  Mechanical compression-induced pressure sores in rat hindlimb: muscle stiffness, histology, and computational models. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  C. G. Lyons,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression: stress-relaxation behaviour and constitutive modelling. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Applications of magnetic resonance elastography to healthy and pathologic skeletal muscle , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Christopher W. Macosko,et al.  Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications , 1994 .

[29]  A Gefen,et al.  In vivo muscle stiffening under bone compression promotes deep pressure sores. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  M. Fink,et al.  Temperature dependence of the shear modulus of soft tissues assessed by ultrasound , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[31]  T. Vogl,et al.  A method for a mechanical characterisation of human gluteal tissue. , 2007, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.