Differences in task demands influence the hemispheric lateralization and neural correlates of metaphor

This study investigated metaphor comprehension in the broader context of task-difference effects and manipulation of processing difficulty. We predicted that right hemisphere recruitment would show greater specificity to processing difficulty rather than metaphor comprehension. Previous metaphor processing studies have established that the left inferior frontal gyrus strongly correlates with metaphor comprehension but there has been controversy about whether right hemisphere (RH) involvement is specific for metaphor comprehension. Functional MRI data were recorded from healthy subjects who read novel metaphors, conventional metaphors, definition-like sentences, or literal sentences. We investigated metaphor processing in contexts where semantic judgment or imagery modulates linguistic judgment. Our findings support the position that the type of task rather than figurative language processing per se modulates the left inferior gyrus (LIFG). RH involvement was more influenced by processing difficulty and less by the novelty or figurativity of linguistic expressions. Our results suggest that figurative language processing depends upon the effects of task-type and processing difficulty on imaging results.

[1]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Task-dependent semantic interference in language production: An fMRI study , 2008, Brain and Language.

[2]  T. Hendler,et al.  An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions , 2007, Brain and Language.

[3]  B. Rosen,et al.  Auditory and visual word processing studied with fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Mark Beeman,et al.  Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .

[6]  M. Erb,et al.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese , 2007, Brain and Language.

[9]  R. Giora Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[10]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences , 2007, Brain and Language.

[11]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[13]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  The Role of the Right Cerebral Hemisphere in Processing Novel Metaphoric Expressions: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Methods for Dealing With Reaction Time Outliers , 1992 .

[15]  Jemett L. Desmond,et al.  Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Right Hemisphere Activation of Joke-related Information: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Binder,et al.  A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems , 2008, Epilepsia.

[18]  T. Hendler,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of Principal Components Analysis to fMRI data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  M. Faust,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphorsfn2 fn2 This research was part of the M.A. thesis of the first author at Bar-Ilan University under the supervision of the second author. , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Michael Erb,et al.  Laterality in metaphor processing: Lack of evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging for the right hemisphere theory , 2007, Brain and Language.

[21]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation? , 1984, Brain and Language.

[22]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Resource limitations as a determinant of right-hemisphere-damaged difficulties in processing alternative metaphorical meaning of words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[23]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.

[24]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension , 2000, Brain and Language.

[25]  J. Voogd,et al.  The Human Central Nervous System , 1978, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[26]  C. Burgess,et al.  Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Metaphor Comprehension and Other Figurative Language , 1996 .

[27]  J. Pynte,et al.  The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1996, Brain and Language.

[28]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Mind's Eye—Precuneus Activation in Memory-Related Imagery , 1995, NeuroImage.

[29]  G. Winocur,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[30]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Differential Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor , 2000 .

[31]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Getting the Right Idea: Semantic Activation in the Right Hemisphere May Help Solve Insight Problems , 1998 .

[32]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[33]  M. Just,et al.  Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  M. Faust,et al.  Understanding metaphoric sentences in the two cerebral hemispheres. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[35]  T. Hendler,et al.  An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences , 2009, Laterality.

[36]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of words after right- and left-hemispheric lesion , 2003, Brain and Language.

[38]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[39]  T. Crow,et al.  Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere? , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  J. Desmond,et al.  The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Left But Not Right Temporal Involvement in Opaque Idiom Comprehension: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Goodale Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1995 .

[43]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[44]  Katherine P. Rankin,et al.  Detecting sarcasm from paralinguistic cues: Anatomic and cognitive correlates in neurodegenerative disease , 2009, NeuroImage.

[45]  Yo Matsumoto Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs , 1996 .

[46]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Identification of activated regions during a language task. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[47]  A. Kasher,et al.  Effects of Right and Left Hemisphere Damage on Performance of the “Right Hemisphere Communication Battery” , 2002, Brain and Language.

[48]  S. Coulson,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  C D Frith,et al.  Brain activity during memory retrieval. The influence of imagery and semantic cueing. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Recruitment of anterior and posterior structures in lexical–semantic processing: An fMRI study comparing implicit and explicit tasks , 2008, Brain and Language.

[51]  J. Voogd,et al.  The human central nervous system , 1978 .

[52]  Paul M Matthews,et al.  The Role of the Posterior Fusiform Gyrus in Reading , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  Michael Erb,et al.  Impact of task difficulty on lateralization of pitch and duration discrimination , 2005, Neuroreport.

[55]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.