Grasping Preparation Enhances Orientation Change Detection

Preparing a goal directed movement often requires detailed analysis of our environment. When picking up an object, its orientation, size and relative distance are relevant parameters when preparing a successful grasp. It would therefore be beneficial if the motor system is able to influence early perception such that information processing needs for action control are met at the earliest possible stage. However, only a few studies reported (indirect) evidence for action-induced visual perception improvements. We therefore aimed to provide direct evidence for a feature-specific perceptual modulation during the planning phase of a grasping action. Human subjects were instructed to either grasp or point to a bar while simultaneously performing an orientation discrimination task. The bar could slightly change its orientation during grasping preparation. By analyzing discrimination response probabilities, we found increased perceptual sensitivity to orientation changes when subjects were instructed to grasp the bar, rather than point to it. As a control experiment, the same experiment was repeated using bar luminance changes, a feature that is not relevant for either grasping or pointing. Here, no differences in visual sensitivity between grasping and pointing were found. The present results constitute first direct evidence for increased perceptual sensitivity to a visual feature that is relevant for a certain skeletomotor act during the movement preparation phase. We speculate that such action-induced perception improvements are controlled by neuronal feedback mechanisms from cortical motor planning areas to early visual cortex, similar to what was recently established for spatial perception improvements shortly before eye movements.

[1]  J. Leon Kenemans,et al.  Lateralized Frontal Eye Field Activity Precedes Occipital Activity Shortly before Saccades: Evidence for Cortico-cortical Feedback as a Mechanism Underlying Covert Attention Shifts , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2003, Nature.

[3]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Integration of visual and somatosensory target information in goal-directed eye and arm movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Selection-for-action in visual search. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[9]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  B. Hommel,et al.  Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions , 2007, Psychological research.

[13]  Björn N. S. Vlaskamp,et al.  TMS pulses on the frontal eye fields break coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[15]  Joseph S. Gati,et al.  Visually-guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2010 .

[16]  O. Neumann Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention , 1987 .

[17]  L. Vainio,et al.  Grasp preparation improves change detection for congruent objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: a critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[20]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.

[21]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[22]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 1986, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: A TMS approach , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  H Bekkering,et al.  Neural and temporal dynamics underlying visual selection for action. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  T P Gutteling,et al.  fMRI-guided TMS on cortical eye fields: the frontal but not intraparietal eye fields regulate the coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.