Review of steel buckling‐restrained braces

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are a relatively recent development in the field of seismic-resistant steel structures. Their distinctive feature is the non-buckling behaviour typically achieved by encasing a steel core in a concrete-filled tube, but alternatives have been proposed. Restraining the brace from buckling enhances ductility significantly and allows a symmetric response under tension or compression forces. The design of BRB frames must consider a number of specific issues that are currently not covered by European standards and regulations. This paper presents a brief summary of the most recent research results and attempts to summarize the basic design issues as they emerge from both research and the codification rules of non-European Countries. Conclusions are drawn regarding future research required to address the development of design rules in Europe, too.

[1]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Seismic performance of tubular structures with buckling restrained braces , 2009 .

[2]  A. Korzekwa R. Tremblay,et al.  Numerical simulation of the cyclic inelastic behaviour of buckling restrained braces , 2009 .

[3]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Ductility demands on buckling-restrained braced frames under earthquake loading , 2003 .

[4]  Satoshi Yamada,et al.  Estimation of Cumulative Deformation Capacity of Buckling Restrained Braces , 2008 .

[5]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections , 2008 .

[6]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic testing and performance of buckling- restrained bracing systems , 2006 .

[7]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system , 2006 .

[8]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of braced steel structures , 2010 .

[9]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[10]  P Clark,et al.  EVALUATION OF DESIGN METHODOLOGIES FOR STRUCTURES INCORPORATING STEEL UNBONDED BRACES FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION , 2000 .

[11]  Qiang Xie,et al.  State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia , 2005 .

[12]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Seismic analysis of MR steel frames based on refined hysteretic models of connections , 2002 .

[13]  Peter W. Clark,et al.  Large-Scale Testing of Steel Unbonded Braces for Energy Dissipation , 2000 .

[14]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Experimental analysis of steel dissipative bracing systems for seismic upgrading , 2009 .

[15]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  EUROCODE 8 PROVISIONS FOR STEEL AND STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES: COMMENTS, CRITIQUES, IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2009 .

[16]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[17]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum , 2006 .

[18]  F. López-Almansa,et al.  A low-tech dissipative buckling restrained brace. Design, analysis, production and testing , 2009 .

[19]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[20]  Larry Alan Fahnestock,et al.  Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength , 2011 .

[21]  Gaetano Della Corte,et al.  Development of a Displacement-Based Design Method for Steel Dual Systems With Buckling-Restrained Braces and Moment-Resisting Frames , 2010 .