Assessment of examinations in computer science doctoral education

This article surveys the examination requirements for attaining degree candidate (candidacy) status in computer science doctoral programs at all of the computer science doctoral granting institutions in the United States. It presents a framework for program examination requirement categorization, and categorizes these programs by the type or types of candidacy examinations that are required. The performance of computer science departments, estimated via two common surrogate metrics, in these different categories of candidacy requirements are compared and contrasted and the correlation between candidacy requirements and program/department performance is assessed.

[1]  James M. Heffernan,et al.  The Credibility of the Credit Hour; The History, Use, and Shortcomings of the Credit System. , 1973 .

[2]  Yaritza Ferrer de Valero.  Departmental Factors Affecting Time-to-Degree and Completion Rates of Doctoral Students at One Land-Grant Research Institution , 2001 .

[3]  Travis D. Park,et al.  Experiential Learning Enhances Student Knowledge Retention in the Plant Sciences , 2012 .

[4]  Elizabeth Fisher,et al.  Enjoy Writing Your Science Thesis or Dissertation , 1999 .

[5]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Innovative Application of a New PBL Model to Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Projects , 2010 .

[6]  Sidney L. Pressey,et al.  The Final Ordeal , 1932 .

[7]  Carol M. Roberts,et al.  The Dissertation Journey: A Practical and Comprehensive Guide to Planning, Writing, and Defending Your Dissertation , 2004 .

[8]  Jeremiah P. Ostriker,et al.  A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States , 2011 .

[9]  George E. Forsythe,et al.  A university's educational program in computer science , 1967, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Chris M. Golde,et al.  At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. , 2001 .

[11]  Frances M. Hill.  Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumer , 1995 .

[12]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics. , 2000 .

[13]  Heidi Estrem,et al.  Embedded Traditions, Uneven Reform: The Place of the Comprehensive Exam in Composition and Rhetoric PhD Programs , 2003 .

[14]  Edward J. McCluskey,et al.  Curriculum 68: Recommendations for academic programs in computer science: a report of the ACM curriculum committee on computer science , 1968, CACM.

[15]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Doctoral program rankings for U.S. computing programs: the national research council strikes out , 2011, CACM.

[16]  Ashley Edwards,et al.  Engaging students through authentic research experiences , 2012 .

[17]  Audrey J. Jaeger,et al.  Completing the Three Stages of Doctoral Education: An Event History Analysis , 2012 .

[18]  R. Beichner.  The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[19]  Joseph A. Schafer,et al.  Doctoral Comprehensive Exams: Standardization, Customization, and Everywhere in Between , 2008 .

[20]  David Madsen,et al.  Successful Dissertations and Theses: A Guide to Graduate Student Research from Proposal to Completion. , 1983 .

[21]  George Miaoulis,et al.  Communicating a quality position in service delivery: an application in higher education , 2003 .