Impact of water allocation strategies to manage groundwater resources in Western Australia: Equity and efficiency considerations

Abstract In many parts of the world groundwater is being depleting at an alarming rate. Where groundwater extraction is licenced, regulators often respond to resource depletion by reducing all individual licences by a fixed proportion. This approach can be effective in achieving a reduction in the volume of water extracted, but the approach is not efficient. In water resource management the issue of the equity-efficiency trade-off has been explored in a number of contexts, but not in the context of allocation from a groundwater system. To contribute to this knowledge gap we conduct an empirical case study for Western Australia’s most important groundwater system: the Gnangara Groundwater System (GGS). Resource depletion is a serious issue for the GGS, and substantial reductions in groundwater extraction are required to stabilise the system. Using an individual-based farm optimization model we study both the overall impact and the distributional impact of a fixed percentage water allocation cut to horticulture sector licence holders. The model is parameterised using water licence specific data on farm area and water allocation. The modelling shows that much of the impact of water allocation reductions can be mitigated through changing the cropping mix and the irrigation technology used. The modelling also shows that the scope for gains through the aggregation of holdings into larger farms is much greater than the potential losses due to water allocation reductions. The impact of water allocation cuts is also shown to impact large farms more than small farms. For example, the expected loss in net revenue per ha for a 10-ha farm is around three times the expected loss per ha for a 1-ha farm; and the expected loss per ha for a 25-ha farm is around five times the expected loss per ha for a 1-ha farm.

[1]  U. Chakravorty,et al.  Efficient Spatial Allocation of Irrigation Water , 1991 .

[2]  D. Connell,et al.  The Social-Environmental Justice of Groundwater Governance , 2016 .

[3]  Donna C. Brennan.  Policy Interventions to Promote the Adoption of Water Saving Sprinkler Systems: The Case of Lettuce on the Gnangara Mound , 2007 .

[4]  Megan McGuire,et al.  Groundwater Allocation Using a Groundwater Level Response Management Method—Gnangara Groundwater System, Western Australia , 2009 .

[5]  Michael B. Ward,et al.  Prices Versus Rationing: Marshallian Surplus and Mandatory Water Restrictions , 2008 .

[6]  Casey Brown,et al.  Assessing groundwater policy with coupled economic‐groundwater hydrologic modeling , 2014 .

[7]  J. Cochran,et al.  Equity Reexamined: A Study of Community-Based Rainwater Harvesting in Rajasthan, India , 2009 .

[8]  J. Tisdell.  Equity and Social Justice in Water Doctrines , 2003 .

[9]  G. Syme,et al.  Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses , 1999 .

[10]  Manuel Pulido-Velazquez,et al.  Efficiency, equity, and sustainability in a water quantity-quality optimization model in the Rio Grande basin , 2008 .

[11]  M. Mainuddin,et al.  CATCHMENT BEHAVIOR AND COUNTER‐CYCLICAL WATER TRADE: AN INTEGRATED MODEL , 2006 .

[12]  Els Lecoutere,et al.  Equity-efficiency trade-offs in irrigation water sharing: evidence from a field lab in rural Tanzania , 2012 .

[13]  D. Pannell,et al.  Institutional impediments to groundwater trading: the case of the Gnangara groundwater system of Western Australia , 2013 .

[14]  Geoffrey J. Syme,et al.  Planning attitudes, lay philosophies, and water allocation: A preliminary analysis and research agenda , 1996 .

[15]  Riasat Ali,et al.  Opportunity for peri-urban Perth groundwater trade , 2013 .

[16]  P. Hellegers,et al.  Water allocation reform: what makes it so difficult? , 2015 .

[17]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  Nonparametric Econometrics: The np Package , 2008 .