Social network profiling for cultural heritage: combining data from direct and indirect approaches

The work argues for quick profiling methods from social networks for use in cultural heritage applications. Explicit (inquiries about user actions, like game playing) and implicit (observations from user actions on social networks) methods are tested, in an attempt to extract user personality profiles and in particular cognitive style profiles, using the MBTI tool. Qualitative and quantitative approaches have been applied to validate the results. So far, it seems that users’ cognitive profiles can be predicted from social media observations and user actions (i.e., playing games) for 3 out of the 4 MBTI dimensions. There seem to be relatively accurate predictions for the dimensions Judging–Perceiving and Extraversion–Introversion. Sensing–Intuition is a little more difficult to predict. Currently, the Thinking–Feeling dimension cannot be predicted from the existing data. Future works will concentrate on improving the prediction rate for the Sensing–Intuition dimensions and discovering ways to predict the Thinking–Sensing dimension from social network information.

[1]  Shaojung Sharon Wang,et al.  "I Share, Therefore I Am": Personality Traits, Life Satisfaction, and Facebook Check-Ins , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  R. Cattell,et al.  Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF) , 1970 .

[3]  S. Michael Handbook in research and evaluation , 1971 .

[4]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[5]  Agustín Santana Talavera,et al.  Facebook, heritage and tourism reorientation. The cases of Tenerife and Fuerteventura (Canary Isles, Spain) , 2012, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[6]  George Lepouras,et al.  Connecting physical space, human personalities and social networks , 2013 .

[7]  Charles B. Callaway,et al.  Experiments with Mobile Drama in an Instrumented Museum for Inducing Conversation in Small Groups , 2014, TIIS.

[8]  Steven A. Julious,et al.  Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study , 2005 .

[9]  Mohd Abdul Hameed,et al.  Information Gain Clustering through Prototype-Embedded Genetic K-Mean Algorithm (IGCPGKA): a novel heuristic approach for personalisation of cold start problem , 2012, CCSEIT '12.

[10]  A. Furnham The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality , 1996 .

[11]  Robert J. Harvey,et al.  A "Big Five" Scoring System for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1995 .

[12]  R. Mar,et al.  What Does My Avatar Say About Me? Inferring Personality From Avatars , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  Juliane M. Stopfer,et al.  Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization , 2010, Psychological science.

[14]  Li Chen,et al.  Personality and Recommender Systems , 2015, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[15]  Giorgos Lepouras,et al.  Gaming and Cognitive Profiles for Recommendations in Museums , 2013, 2013 8th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization.

[16]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  A visitor's guide in an active museum: Presentations, communications, and reflection , 2011, JOCCH.

[17]  Yannick Naudet,et al.  Personality Matters: Balancing for Personality Types Leads to Better Outcomes for Crowd Teams , 2016, CSCW.

[18]  Gary Geisler,et al.  Understanding personal digital collections: an interdisciplinary exploration , 2012, DIS '12.

[19]  Krzysztof Walczak,et al.  Dynamic interactive VR network services for education , 2006, VRST '06.

[20]  M. Birnbaum The Fronts Students Use: Facebook and the Standardization of Self-Presentations , 2013 .

[21]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus , 2004, CHI.

[22]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  User-Centred Design of Flexible Hypermedia for a Mobile Guide: Reflections on the HyperAudio Experience , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[23]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  Assessing the Reliability of Facebook User Profiling , 2015, WWW.

[24]  Sus Lundgren,et al.  Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction , 2015, CSCW.

[25]  Alexis A. Fink,et al.  The Effects of Personality and Management Role on Perceived Values in Business Settings , 2000 .

[26]  Bruce Ferwerda,et al.  Personality Traits and the Relationship with (Non-) Disclosure Behavior on Facebook , 2016, WWW.

[27]  Maria Roussou,et al.  Capturing the Visitor Profile for a Personalized Mobile Museum Experience: an Indirect Approach , 2016, UMAP.

[28]  Noël Crespi,et al.  Analysis of publicly disclosed information in Facebook profiles , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[29]  Chen Lin,et al.  PRemiSE: personalized news recommendation via implicit social experts , 2012, CIKM.

[30]  Fabio Celli,et al.  Automatic Personality and Interaction Style Recognition from Facebook Profile Pictures , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[31]  Gregory J. Park,et al.  Automatic personality assessment through social media language. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Marko Tkalcic,et al.  Addressing the New User Problem with a Personality Based User Similarity Measure , 2011 .

[33]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Manifestations of Personality in Online Social Networks: Self-Reported Facebook-Related Behaviors and Observable Profile Information , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  S. Sternberg Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[35]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Rosa M. Carro,et al.  Inferring user personality in social networks: A case study in Facebook , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.

[37]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire , 1975 .

[38]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Using social data as context for making recommendations: an ontology based approach , 2009, CIAO '09.

[39]  Yoram Bachrach,et al.  Personality and Website Choice , 2012 .

[40]  Steve Benford,et al.  see me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden , 2013, CHI.

[41]  Gabriel-Miro Muntean,et al.  Open corpus architecture for personalised ubiquitous e-learning , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[42]  John J. Koran,et al.  Predicting Visitor Behavior , 2010 .

[43]  Pt Jr Costa Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory , 1992 .

[44]  T. Osberg,et al.  The Relative Accuracy of Self-Predictions and Judgments by Others in Psychological Assessment , 1981 .

[46]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Predicting personality with social media , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[47]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Supporting small groups in the museum by context-aware communication services , 2007, IUI '07.

[48]  Andrzej Niesler,et al.  User Profiling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Based on Myers-Briggs Personality Types , 2009 .

[49]  Michael Roberts,et al.  Unsupervised Modeling of Users' Interests from their Facebook Profiles and Activities , 2015, IUI.

[50]  Pushmeet Kohli,et al.  Your digital image: factors behind demographic and psychometric predictions from social network profiles , 2014, AAMAS.

[51]  Giorgos Lepouras,et al.  User Profiling: Towards a Facebook Game that Reveals Cognitive Style , 2013, GALA.

[52]  Bruce Ferwerda,et al.  Personality & Emotional States: Understanding Users' Music Listening Needs , 2015, UMAP Workshops.

[53]  Giorgos Lepouras,et al.  Modeling visitors' profiles: A study to investigate adaptation aspects for museum learning technologies , 2010, JOCCH.

[54]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[55]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Whose Thumb Is It Anyway? Classifying Author Personality from Weblog Text , 2006, ACL.

[56]  Nadia Mana,et al.  Modeling the Personality of Participants During Group Interactions , 2009, UMAP.

[57]  Giorgos Lepouras,et al.  Improving museum visitors' Quality of Experience through intelligent recommendations: A visiting style-based approach , 2013, Intelligent Environments.

[58]  Jieun Kim,et al.  Personality and its effects on learning performance: Design guidelines for an adaptive e-learning system based on a user model , 2013 .

[59]  Pierluigi Ritrovato,et al.  A grid based software architecture for delivery of adaptive and personalised learning experiences , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[60]  Maria Roussou,et al.  A life of their own: museum visitor personas penetrating the design lifecycle of a mobile experience , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[61]  Themis Panayiotopoulos,et al.  A platform for virtual museums with personalized content , 2009, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[62]  J. Richard Jennings,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions in choice reaction time: Experimental designs and computational procedures , 1976 .

[63]  Michela Bertolotto,et al.  Towards dynamic behavior-based profiling for reducing spatial information overload in map browsing activity , 2011, GeoInformatica.

[64]  W. Marston Emotions of normal people , 1928 .

[65]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[66]  Thomas Hillman,et al.  Instagram at the museum: communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing , 2013, CHI.

[67]  J. B. Lloyd The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® and mainstream psychology: analysis and evaluation of an unresolved hostility , 2012 .