Comparison of Cramer classification between Toxtree, the OECD QSAR Toolbox and expert judgment.

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a pragmatic approach in risk assessment. In the absence of data, it sets up levels of human exposure that are considered to have no appreciable risk to human health. The Cramer decision tree is used extensively to determine these exposure thresholds by categorizing non-carcinogenic chemicals into three different structural classes. Therefore, assigning an accurate Cramer class to a material is a crucial step to preserve the integrity of the risk assessment. In this study the Cramer class of over 1000 fragrance materials across diverse chemical classes were determined by using Toxtree (TT), the OECD QSAR Toolbox (TB), and expert judgment. Disconcordance was observed between TT and the TB. A total of 165 materials (16%) showed different results from the two programs. The overall concordance for Cramer classification between TT and expert judgment is 83%, while the concordance between the TB and expert judgment is 77%. Amines, lactones and heterocycles have the lowest percent agreement with expert judgment for TT and the TB. For amines, the expert judgment agreement is 45% for TT and 55% for the TB. For heterocycles, the expert judgment agreement is 55% for TT and the TB. For lactones, the expert judgment agreement is 56% for TT and 50% for the TB. Additional analyses were conducted to determine the concordance within various chemical classes. Critical checkpoints in the decision tree are identified. Strategies and guidance on determining the Cramer class for various chemical classes are discussed.

[1]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[2]  R. Kroes.  Structure-Based Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC): Guidance for Application to Substances Present at Low Levels in the Diet , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cinnamyl phenylpropyl materials when used as fragrance ingredients. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[4]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicological and dermatological assessment of alkyl cyclic ketones when used as fragrance ingredients. RIFM Expert Panel. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[6]  N. Skovgaard.  Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants , 2000 .

[7]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[8]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicological and dermatological assessment of macrocyclic lactone and lactide derivatives when used as fragrance ingredients. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  R Kroes,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  Worth Andrew,et al.  Analysis of the Cramer classification scheme for oral systemic toxicity - implications for its implementation in Toxtree , 2011 .

[11]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicological and dermatological assessment of aryl alkyl alcohols when used as fragrance ingredients. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[12]  Joint Fao,et al.  Book Review: Safety Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants , 1999 .

[13]  I C Munro,et al.  Safety assessment procedures for indirect food additives: an overview. Report of a workshop. , 1990, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern approach to ingredients in personal and household care products. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[15]  Ian C. Munro Rapporteur.  Safety assessment procedures for indirect food additives: An overview: Report of a workshop , 1990 .

[16]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[17]  R A Ford,et al.  Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach. , 1978, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[18]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cyclopentanones and cyclopentenones when used as fragrance ingredients. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[19]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicological and dermatological assessment of aryl alkyl alcohol simple acid ester derivatives when used as fragrance ingredients. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[20]  D G Hattan,et al.  FDA's priority-based assessment of food additives. III. Specific toxicity parameters. , 1985, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[21]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicological and dermatological assessment of macrocyclic ketones when used as fragrance ingredients: the RIFM Expert Panel. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.