A Curvilinear Abscissa Approach for the Lap Time Optimization of Racing Vehicles

The optimal control and lap time optimization of vehicles such as racing cars and motorcycle is a challenging problem, in particular the approach adopted in the problem formulation has a great impact on the actual possibility of solving such problem by using numerical techniques. This paper illustrates a methodology which combines some modelling technique which have been found to be numerically efficient. The methodology is based on the 3D curvilinear coordinates technique for the road modelling, the moving frame approach for the derivation of the vehicle equations of motion, the replacement of the time with the position along the track as new independent variable and the formulation and the solution of the minimum lap time problem by means of the indirect approach. The case study of a GT car is presented and simulation examples are given and discussed.

[1]  Francesco Braghin,et al.  Race driver model , 2008 .

[2]  M. Gerdts A moving horizon technique for the simulation of automobile test‐drives , 2003 .

[3]  Roberto Lot,et al.  A Symbolic Approach for Automatic Generation of the Equations of Motion of Multibody Systems , 2004 .

[4]  Robin S. Sharp,et al.  Time-optimal control of the race car: a numerical method to emulate the ideal driver , 2010 .

[5]  Roberto Lot,et al.  A General Method for the Evaluation of Vehicle Manoeuvrability with Special Emphasis on Motorcycles , 1999 .

[6]  E. Bertolazzi,et al.  real-time motion planning for multibody systems , 2007 .

[7]  Damian Harty,et al.  The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics , 2004 .

[8]  V. Cossalter,et al.  Optimization of the centre of mass position of a racing motorcycle in dry and wet track by means of the “Optimal Maneuver Method” , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM).

[9]  Simos A. Evangelou,et al.  Lap time optimization of a sports series hybrid electric vehicle , 2013 .

[10]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  A Darboux-Frame-Based Formulation of Spin-Rolling Motion of Rigid Objects With Point Contact , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  E. Bertolazzi,et al.  Symbolic–Numeric Indirect Method for Solving Optimal Control Problems for Large Multibody Systems , 2005 .

[12]  Davide Tavernini,et al.  Minimum time cornering: the effect of road surface and car transmission layout , 2013 .

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J R Ellis,et al.  Vehicle Handling Dynamics , 1994 .

[15]  Arthur E. Bryson,et al.  Dynamic Optimization , 1998 .

[16]  Mauro Da Lio,et al.  On the human control of vehicles: an experimental study of acceleration , 2013, European Transport Research Review.

[17]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Methods of analytical dynamics , 1970 .

[18]  F. Biral,et al.  Combining safety margins and user preferences into a driving criterion for optimal control-based computation of reference maneuvers for an ADAS of the next generation , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[19]  Christian Kirches,et al.  Optimal control of Formula 1 race cars in a VDrift based virtual environment , 2011 .

[20]  H. Bock,et al.  Time‐optimal control of automobile test drives with gear shifts , 2010 .