Comparative study of Pareto optimal multi objective cuckoo search algorithm and multi objective particle swarm optimization for power loss minimization incorporating UPFC

The Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices are being commissioned in electrical power systems across the globe owing to the vast array of benefits they offer. The optimal performance of the FACTS devices can be harnessed only if they are installed at a strategic location. In this paper, the authors suggest the merit of multiobjective cuckoo search (MOCS) algorithm in mitigation of transmission losses by strategically installing unified power flower controller (UPFC) at an optimal location. Active power loss and reactive power loss reduction is the multiobjective optimization considered for the study. The Pareto-optimal technique is employed to extract the Pareto-optimal solution for the multiobjective problem considered. The Fuzzy logic method is utilized to yield the best-compromise solution from the pool of Pareto-optimal solution. The proposed approach is tested on a standard IEEE 30 bus test system. Furthermore, the efficacy of the MOCS algorithm is demonstrated by comparing the results with that of multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO).

[1]  Bala Venkatesh,et al.  Optimal Siting of United Power Flow Controllers , 2006 .

[2]  S.J. Cheng,et al.  Optimal location and parameters setting of UPFC based on GA and PSO for enhancing power system security under single contingencies , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[3]  K. R. Subhashini,et al.  Optimal location and parametric settings of FACTS devices based on JAYA blended moth flame optimization for transmission loss minimization in power systems , 2020 .

[4]  L. Gyugyi,et al.  The unified power flow controller: a new approach to power transmission control , 1995 .

[5]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  B. Vijay Kumar,et al.  Enhancement of dynamic stability by optimal location and capacity of UPFC: A hybrid approach , 2020 .

[7]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems , 1999 .

[8]  Manoj B. Daigavane,et al.  Improvement of ORPD Algorithm for Transmission Loss Minimization and Voltage Control Using UPFC by HGAPSO Approach , 2018, Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B.

[9]  Seyed Abbas Taher,et al.  New approach for optimal UPFC placement using hybrid immune algorithm in electric power systems , 2012 .

[10]  Boon-Teck Ooi,et al.  Assessment and control of the impact of FACTS devices on power system performance , 1996 .

[11]  Amin Mahmoudi,et al.  A comparative study of multi-objective optimal power flow based on particle swarm, evolutionary programming, and genetic algorithm , 2015 .

[12]  M. Mani Sankar,et al.  A cost effective voltage sag compensator for distribution system , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[13]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control , 1997 .

[14]  Rajiv K. Varma,et al.  Thyristor-Based Facts Controllers for Electrical Transmission Systems , 2002 .

[15]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Power flow control by use of controllable series components , 1993 .

[16]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization , 2013, Comput. Oper. Res..

[17]  Tejeswara Rao Nartu,et al.  A fuzzified Pareto multiobjective cuckoo search algorithm for power losses minimization incorporating SVC , 2018, Soft Comput..

[18]  Provas Kumar Roy,et al.  Optimal location of UPFC controller in transmission network using hybrid chemical reaction optimization algorithm , 2015 .