Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.

Gleason grading forms the basis of prognostic and therapeutic assessment in prostatic carcinoma despite its subjective nature and substantial interobserver variation. The accuracy of Gleason grading can be improved by the use of educational tools such as reference images. However, conventional microscopy images are of limited educational value because it is neither possible to view the sample at different magnifications nor to navigate into different areas of the specimen. This limitation can be overcome by the use of virtual microscopy, which allows viewing entire digitized microscope slides. We created an interactive Web site ( www.webmicroscope.net/gleason ) featuring a comprehensive set of prostatic needle biopsies as virtual slides, which can be viewed with a standard Web browser (Internet Explorer or Netscape). To evaluate the validity of Web-based virtual microscopy for Gleason grading, an experienced uropathologist (TK) scored a series of 62 biopsies from the original glass slides and 6 weeks later from virtual slides on the Web site using an ordinary desktop computer. The intraobserver agreement was excellent, with identical Gleason scores found in 48 of the 62 cases ( kappa = 0.73). The 14 remaining scores differed only by 1 point on the Gleason scale (2-10). The virtual slides were viewed by 2 other uropathologists (PM and HH), with interobserver kappa coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.62, which is within the range of previously reported studies using glass slides. The 3 uropathologists' Gleason scores were included as reference scores on the Web site, which now serves as a publicly open platform for self-testing and learning of Gleason grading. We conclude that Web-based virtual microscopy is a promising new tool for teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.

[1]  M Bibbo,et al.  Correlation between visual clues, objective architectural features, and interobserver agreement in prostate cancer. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  L. Egevad Reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostate cancer can be improved by the use of reference images. , 2001, Urology.

[3]  J. Epstein,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. , 2001, Human pathology.

[4]  A. Morenas,et al.  Prostatic adenocarcinoma: reproducibility and correlation with clinical stages of four grading systems. , 1988, Human pathology.

[5]  Eric Peltier,et al.  Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays. , 2003, Human pathology.

[6]  Toyonori Tsuzuki,et al.  Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement. , 2003, Human pathology.

[7]  C. Busch,et al.  Histopathology of localized prostate cancer. Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Prognostic Parameters in Localized Prostate Cancer. Stockholm, Sweden, May 12-13, 1993. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum.

[8]  J. Epstein,et al.  A web‐based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy , 2000, Cancer.

[9]  W. Isaacs,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group. Pathological and Molecular Aspects of Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer Ii , 2022 .

[10]  A J Robertson,et al.  Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of needle biopsy specimens of the prostate. , 1997, Human pathology.

[11]  M. Steiner,et al.  Campbell's Urology, 7th ed. , 1998 .

[12]  C. Busch,et al.  Histopathology of localized prostate cancer , 1994 .

[13]  S J Cina,et al.  Pathology residents' use of a Web-based tutorial to improve Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma on needle biopsies. , 2000, Human pathology.

[14]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Web-based tissue microarray image data analysis: initial validation testing through prostate cancer Gleason grading. , 2001, Human pathology.

[15]  D. Bostwick Grading prostate cancer. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  F J Leong,et al.  Automated complete slide digitization: a medium for simultaneous viewing by multiple pathologists , 2001, The Journal of pathology.

[17]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. , 2001, Human pathology.

[18]  Lars Egevad,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens , 2003, Virchows Archiv.

[19]  M Lundin,et al.  A digital atlas of breast histopathology: an application of web based virtual microscopy , 2004, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[20]  Katharina Glatz-Krieger,et al.  Virtual slides: high-quality demand, physical limitations, and affordability. , 2003, Human pathology.

[21]  H Svanholm,et al.  Prostatic carcinoma reproducibility of histologic grading. , 1985, Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section A, Pathology.