Compact Securities Markets for Pareto Optimal Reallocation of Risk

The securities market is the fundamental theoretical framework in economics and finance for resource allocation under uncertainty. Securities serve both to reallocate risk and to disseminate probabilistic information. Complete securities markets-which contain one securitv for every possible state of nature-support Pareto optimal allocations of risk. Complete markets suffer from the same exponential dependence on the number of underlying events as do joint probability distributions. We examine whether markets can be structured and "compacted" in the same manner as Bayesian network representations of joint distributions. We show that, if all agents' risk-neutral independencies agree with the independencies encoded in the market structure, then the market is operationally complete: risk is still Pareto optimally allocated, yet the number of securities can be exponentially smaller. For collections of agents of a certain type, agreement on Markov independencies is sufficient to admit compact and operationally complete markets.

[1]  K. Arrow.  The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-bearing , 1964 .

[2]  Howard E. Reinhardt.  Theory of Probability: A Critical Introductory Treatment, Vol. 2 (Bruno de Finetti) , 1978 .

[3]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[4]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Separating probability elicitation from utilities , 1988 .

[5]  T. Speed,et al.  Markov Fields and Log-Linear Interaction Models for Contingency Tables , 1980 .

[6]  Ross D. Shachter,et al.  Directed reduction algorithms and decomposable graphs , 1990, UAI.

[7]  Chiuh-Cheng Chyu.  Decomposable Probabilistic Influence Diagrams , 1989 .

[8]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[9]  Jacques H. Dreze,et al.  Market allocation under uncertainty , 1970 .

[10]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Graphical Representations of Consensus Belief , 1999, UAI.

[11]  R. Nau.  Coherent decision analysis with inseparable probabilities and utilities , 1995 .

[12]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[13]  R. M. Oliver,et al.  Influence diagrams, belief nets and decision analysis , 1992 .

[14]  J. N. R. Jeffers,et al.  Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. , 1990 .

[15]  Christian Genest,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography , 1986 .

[16]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[17]  H. Varian.  The Arbitrage Principle in Financial Economics , 1987 .

[18]  D. Geiger.  Graphoids: a qualitative framework for probabilistic inference , 1990 .

[19]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  Foundations of Financial Economics , 1997 .

[20]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  “Good” Probability Assessors , 1968 .

[21]  K. McCardle,et al.  Arbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium , 1991 .

[22]  C. Genest,et al.  Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis , 1987 .

[23]  Judea Pearl,et al.  From Bayesian networks to causal networks , 1995 .

[24]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  The Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Inference Using Bayesian Belief Networks , 1990, Artif. Intell..