Visually weighted reconstruction of compressive sensing MRI.

Compressive sensing (CS) enables the reconstruction of a magnetic resonance (MR) image from undersampled data in k-space with relatively low-quality distortion when compared to the original image. In addition, CS allows the scan time to be significantly reduced. Along with a reduction in the computational overhead, we investigate an effective way to improve visual quality through the use of a weighted optimization algorithm for reconstruction after variable density random undersampling in the phase encoding direction over k-space. In contrast to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction methods, the visual weight, in particular, the region of interest (ROI), is investigated here for quality improvement. In addition, we employ a wavelet transform to analyze the reconstructed image in the space domain and fully utilize data sparsity over the spatial and frequency domains. The visual weight is constructed by reflecting the perceptual characteristics of the human visual system (HVS), and then applied to ℓ1 norm minimization, which gives priority to each coefficient during the reconstruction process. Using objective quality assessment metrics, it was found that an image reconstructed using the visual weight has higher local and global quality than those processed by conventional methods.

[1]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[3]  Kevin M Koch,et al.  Compressed‐Sensing multispectral imaging of the postoperative spine , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Karl Krissian,et al.  Noise-Driven Anisotropic Diffusion Filtering of MRI , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Structured Compressed Sensing: From Theory to Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  M. Lustig,et al.  Compressed Sensing MRI , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  J. Sahambi,et al.  Wavelet domain non-linear filtering for MRI denoising. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Single breath‐hold whole‐heart MRA using variable‐density spirals at 3t , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Sang-Young Zho,et al.  Three dimension double inversion recovery gray matter imaging using compressed sensing. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Rick Chartrand,et al.  Fast algorithms for nonconvex compressive sensing: MRI reconstruction from very few data , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  L Kaufman,et al.  Inner volume MR imaging: technical concepts and their application. , 1985, Radiology.

[12]  John D. Villasenor,et al.  Visibility of wavelet quantization noise , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Sanghoon Lee,et al.  Visual Entropy Gain for Wavelet Image Coding , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[15]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Embedded foveation image coding , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  L. He,et al.  MR Image Reconstruction from Sparse Radial Samples Using Bregman Iteration , 2006 .

[19]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Real-time foveated multiresolution system for low-bandwidth video communication , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[20]  A. Majumdar,et al.  An algorithm for sparse MRI reconstruction by Schatten p-norm minimization. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.