The influence of verbal training and visual feedback on manual wheelchair propulsion

Purpose. To determine if verbal training with visual feedback improved manual wheelchair propulsion; to examine propulsion differences between an individual with paraplegia and an individual with tetraplegia. Method. Quasi-experimental study: Nine manual wheelchair-using adults participated in propulsion assessments and training. Baseline propulsion performance was measured on several tasks on different surfaces. Participants were trained on a wheelchair treadmill with verbal and visual feedback to increase push length, reduce push frequency and to modify propulsion pattern. Handrim biomechanics were measured with an instrumented wheel. Changes in propulsion were assessed. Differences in propulsion characteristics between a participant with paraplegia and a participant with tetraplegia were examined. Results. Push length increased (p < 0.05), push frequency decreased (p < 0.01) and peak (p < 0.05) and average (p < 0.01) forces increased immediately after training. These changes were not sustained over time. Graphic representations showed differences in propulsion characteristics between a participant with paraplegia and a participant with tetraplegia. Conclusions. Verbal training may produce changes in push biomechanics of manual wheelchair users. Longer training periods may be needed to sustain propulsion changes. Findings from this study support other studies that have shown propulsion differences between people with tetraplegia and paraplegia. Propulsion training for populations with upper-extremity impairments warrants further study.

[1]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  SMART/sup Wheels/: development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Allard J. van der Beek,et al.  Assessment of exposure to pushing and pulling in epidemiological field studies: An overview of methods, exposure measures, and measurement strategies , 1999 .

[3]  Margaret A. Finley,et al.  The biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion in individuals with and without upper-limb impairment. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  J. Perry,et al.  The effect of level of spinal cord injury on shoulder joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  The effect of visual biofeedback on the propulsion effectiveness of experienced wheelchair users. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Y. Fukuoka,et al.  Effects of wheelchair training on [Vdot]O2 kinetics in the participants with spinal-cord injury , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[7]  R N Robertson,et al.  Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Perry,et al.  Three dimensional upper extremity motion during manual wheelchair propulsion in men with different levels of spinal cord injury. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[9]  W Mark Richter,et al.  Stroke pattern and handrim biomechanics for level and uphill wheelchair propulsion at self-selected speeds. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Kolber,et al.  Shoulder pain in wheelchair users with tetraplegia and paraplegia. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Preliminary outcomes of the SmartWheel Users' Group database: a proposed framework for clinicians to objectively evaluate manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Krista L Best,et al.  Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  A J Moss,et al.  Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: prevalence, payment, need, and trends. , 1992, Advance data.

[14]  Gail Powell-Cope,et al.  Wheelchair‐related Falls: Current Evidence and Directions for Improved Quality Care , 2005, Journal of nursing care quality.

[15]  C E Beekman,et al.  Energy cost of propulsion in standard and ultralight wheelchairs in people with spinal cord injuries. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[16]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion capacity during rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  Stefan van Drongelen,et al.  Glenohumeral contact forces and muscle forces evaluated in wheelchair-related activities of daily living in able-bodied subjects versus subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Sonja de Groot,et al.  Course of gross mechanical efficiency in handrim wheelchair propulsion during rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  M M Rodgers,et al.  Influence of training on biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  S de Groot,et al.  Effect of Wheelchair Stroke Pattern on Mechanical Efficiency , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  I Bolin,et al.  Sitting position–Posture and performance in C5–C6 tetraplegia , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[22]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Mechanical efficiency and wheelchair performance during and after spinal cord injury rehabilitation. , 2007, International journal of sports medicine.

[23]  D J Sanderson,et al.  Kinematic features of wheelchair propulsion. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Jacquelin Perry,et al.  Effects of spinal cord injury level on the activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion: an electromyographic study. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  H E Veeger,et al.  Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross-sectional analysis. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[26]  V. Goosey-Tolfrey,et al.  Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[27]  J. Russell,et al.  Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. , 1997, Advance data.

[28]  M. Boninger,et al.  Shoulder joint kinetics and pathology in manual wheelchair users. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[29]  Aaron L. Souza,et al.  Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  Tae-Gyung Kang,et al.  Mobility Device Use in the United States , 2003 .

[32]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Manual wheelchair pushrim dynamics in people with multiple sclerosis. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.