Restoration of Old Forest Features in Coast Redwood Forests Using Early‐stage Variable‐density Thinning

To accelerate development of old forest features in coast redwood, two thinning treatments and an unthinned control were compared in three treatment areas in north coastal California. One thinning treatment was designed to restore old forest densities of 125 trees/ha and the other 250 trees/ha representing a one-step and partial treatments to the desired stand density. Four years after treatment, numbers of trees had increased in the thinning treatments due to recruitment of new trees, but had decreased in the control due to self-thinning. Residual trees increased in stem volume following thinning by 128% in low-density thinning compared to 70% in the controls indicating thinning accelerated stand development. The thinning treatments also moved the species composition of these stands to a greater proportion of redwood. Considerable slash was produced by the thinning treatments but was decomposing rapidly. Black bears damaged approximately 15% of all trees and more than 38% of residual trees in the thinned treatments compared to less than 2% of all trees in the control. This damage included killing some trees and damaging other trees that survived. Decisions over restoration densities in these stands are complicated by prolonged stand development, and balancing risks and costs. In this case, the bears represent a stochastic factor that dramatically increases risk. Thinning appears to be an effective means of enhancing old forest development by accelerating tree growth, modifying species composition, and increasing stand-level variability. Continued monitoring will be necessary to evaluate long-term trends in density relative to effects of bear damage.

[1]  C. Dagley.  Spatial Pattern of Coast Redwood in Three Alluvial Flat Old-Growth Forests in Northern California , 2008 .

[2]  R. Dodd,et al.  Incidence, size and spatial structure of clones in second-growth stands of coast redwood, Sequoia sempervirens (Cupressaceae). , 2004, American journal of botany.

[3]  M. Madej,et al.  Presettlement and modern disturbance regimes in coast redwood forests: Implications for the conservation of old-growth stands , 2009 .

[4]  A. B. Carey.  Biocomplexity and restoration of biodiversity in temperate coniferous forest: inducing spatial heterogeneity with variable‐density thinning , 2003 .

[5]  A. Larson,et al.  Spatial patterns of overstory trees in late- successional conifer forests , 2008 .

[6]  John-Pascal Berrill,et al.  Dynamics of coast redwood sprout clump development in variable light environments , 2010, Journal of Forest Research.

[7]  Bruce B. Bingham,et al.  Volume and mass of decaying logs in an upland old-growth redwood forest , 1988 .

[8]  S. C. Sillett,et al.  TRUNK REITERATION PROMOTES EPIPHYTES AND WATER STORAGE IN AN OLD‐GROWTH REDWOOD FOREST CANOPY , 2007 .

[9]  J. O. Sawyer,et al.  Upland log volumes and conifer establishment patterns in two northern, upland old-growth redwood forests, a brief synopsis , 2007 .

[10]  J. Franklin,et al.  Influence of canopy structure on the understory environment in tall, old-growth, conifer forests , 2000 .

[11]  B. Kimball,et al.  Effects of Thinning and Nitrogen Fertilization on Sugars and Terpenes in Douglas-Fir Vascular Tissues: Implications for Black Bear Foraging , 1998 .

[12]  C. Oliver,et al.  Stability and density management in Douglas-fir plantations , 2000 .

[13]  K. O’Hara,et al.  Understory stump sprout development under variable canopy density and leaf area in coast redwood , 2007 .

[14]  J. Trappe,et al.  The Seen and Unseen World of the Fallen Tree , 1984 .

[15]  R. Curtis.  Volume Growth Trends in a Douglas-Fir Levels-of-Growing-Stock Study , 2006 .