Risk Communication and the Role of the Public: Towards Inclusive Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea?

This chapter focuses on forms of and challenges for risk communication within regional environmental governance, based on an analysis of five environmental risks in the Baltic Sea – marine oil transportation, chemicals, overfishing, eutrophication and alien species. We address questions about how risks are framed and communicated and also analyse the role of communication in the governance process. Our main focus is on risk communication with the public (e.g. existing institutional arrangements and procedures of risk communication), but we also relate this analysis to discussions on communication with a broad range of actors and issues of stakeholder participation and communication. In the study we have identified some examples of relatively well-working risk communication with parts of the organised public in the Baltic Sea region (BSR), such as in fisheries or eutrophication, but also a number of different barriers and obstacles. Our key result from this study is that BSR consists of many national institutions for risk communication, but that there are hardly any centralised institutions for risk communication activities relating to environmental governance in the region. Another key conclusion is that public risk communication in this array of cross-national environmental risks is restricted mainly to (one-way) information. Against this backdrop and from our empirical and theoretical knowledge of risk communication and the role of the public, we finally suggest some ways for improvement.

[1]  Michael Gilek,et al.  Hazardous substances : a case study of environmental risk governance in the Baltic Sea region , 2010 .

[2]  Ortwin Renn.  Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[3]  Sebastian Linke,et al.  Unravelling science-policy interactions in environmental risk governance of the Baltic Sea: comparing fisheries and eutrophication , 2014 .

[4]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[5]  Sebastian Linke,et al.  The Regional Advisory Councils: What is Their Potential to Incorporate Stakeholder Knowledge into Fisheries Governance? , 2011, AMBIO.

[6]  Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance , 2004 .

[7]  A. Jönsson,et al.  Participatory Deliberation, Risk Governance and Management of the Marine Region in the European Union , 2014 .

[8]  M. McCombs.  A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[9]  Marko Joas,et al.  Governance in the Baltic Sea Region: Balancing States, Cities and People , 2008 .

[10]  Stacy D. Vandeveer.  Networked Baltic Environmental Cooperation , 2011 .

[11]  Governance for the Environment: Governance for sustainable development in a world of rising interdependencies , 2009 .

[12]  Svein Jentoft,et al.  A communicative turnaround: Shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance , 2013 .

[13]  A. Stirling.  Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .

[14]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Reframing Policy Discourse , 2020, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning.

[15]  Emma. Weitkamp,et al.  Introducing Science Communication: A Practical Guide , 2009 .

[16]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[17]  G. Breakwell.  The Psychology of Risk: Social amplification and social representations of risk , 2007 .

[18]  G. Mazzoleni,et al.  "Mediatization" of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? , 1999 .

[19]  Alison Anderson,et al.  Media, Culture And The Environment , 1997 .

[20]  Anna Maria Jönsson,et al.  Framing Environmental Risks in the Baltic Sea: A News Media Analysis , 2011, AMBIO.

[21]  J. Strömbäck.  Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics , 2008 .

[22]  M. Castells.  The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance , 2008 .

[23]  B. Hassler,et al.  Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Management in Regional Marine Governance? The Baltic Sea Context , 2013 .

[24]  K. Asp.  Mäktiga massmedier : studier i politisk opinionsbildning , 1986 .

[25]  Sebastian Linke,et al.  The Ecosystem Approach to Management in Baltic Sea Governance : Towards Increased Refl exivity ? , 2016 .

[26]  Michael S. Carolan.  Precautionary Politics: Principle and Practice in Confronting Environmental Risk , 2008 .

[27]  Anders Hansen.  Environment, Media and Communication , 2010 .

[28]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content , 1995 .

[29]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[30]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[31]  J. Voss,et al.  Reflexive governance for sustainable development , 2006 .

[32]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Democracy and the Environment on the Internet: Electronic Citizen Participation in Regulatory Rulemaking , 2006 .

[33]  Cecil C. Konijnendijk,et al.  Communication between science, policy and citizens in public participation in urban forestry—Experiences from the Neighbourwoods project , 2007 .

[34]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Trust, transparancy, and social context: implifications for social amplification of risk , 2003 .

[35]  P. Taylor-Gooby,et al.  Risk in social science , 2006 .

[36]  Michael Gilek,et al.  Governance of Complex Socio-Environmental Risks: The Case of Hazardous Chemicals in the Baltic Sea , 2011, AMBIO.

[37]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Risk, environment and technology , 2006 .

[38]  Julie Doyle,et al.  Citizen voices: Performing public participation in science and environment communication , 2012 .

[39]  Alan Irwin,et al.  Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe , 2006 .

[40]  Robert Cox,et al.  Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere , 2006 .

[41]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Global Risk Governance , 2008 .

[42]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[43]  B. Hassler,et al.  The Ecosystem Approach to Management in Baltic Sea Governance : Towards Increased Reflexivity? , 2016 .

[44]  S. Jentoft,et al.  Marine Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis , 2007 .

[45]  Sebastian Linke,et al.  Fisheries: A Case Study of Baltic Sea Environmental Governance , 2016 .

[46]  K. Kern,et al.  The External Dimension of European Union Marine Governance: Institutional Interplay between the EU and the International Maritime Organization , 2013, Global Environmental Politics.

[47]  Patricia Parsons.  Science in Public , 2010 .

[48]  B. Marchi.  Public participation and risk governance , 2003 .

[49]  Sustainability and re fl exive governance : introduction , 2006 .

[50]  Ulrike Felt,et al.  Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement , 2010 .

[51]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance, Politics and the State , 2000 .

[52]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[53]  V. Koester.  Making Treaties Work: The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) , 2007 .

[54]  O. Young,et al.  Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives , 2009 .

[55]  Winfried Schulz,et al.  Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept , 2004 .

[56]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[57]  Massimiano Bucchi,et al.  Can genetics help us rethink communication? Public communication of science as a ‘double helix’ , 2004 .

[58]  Magnus Boström,et al.  Transparency through Labelling? Layers of Visibility in Environmental Risk Management , 2008 .

[59]  Wenmouth Williams,et al.  The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media in a Signal Starved Market. , 1976 .

[60]  S. Jentoft,et al.  Exploring the phronetic dimension of stakeholders' knowledge in EU fisheries governance , 2014 .