Stimulus Encoding Processes in Human Learning and Memory

[1]  H. Ellis,et al.  Stimulus encoding and the transfer of stimulus differentiation , 1974 .

[2]  H. Ellis,et al.  Encoding effects of response belongingness and stimulus meaningfulness on recognition memory of trigram stimuli , 1973 .

[3]  H. Ellis,et al.  Stimulus encoding and the relationship between stimulus recognition and association formation , 1973 .

[4]  J L Santa,et al.  Effects of verbal coding on recognition memory. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  H. Ellis,et al.  Stimulus codability and long-term recognition memory for visual form. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  H. Ellis,et al.  Verbal processes in long-term stimulus-recognition memory , 1971 .

[7]  E. Martin.  Verbal learning theory and independent retrieval phenomena. , 1971 .

[8]  I. Steele Russell,et al.  Role of encoding unitization in cued recognition memory , 1971 .

[9]  G. Bower.  Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning , 1970 .

[10]  R. H. Price,et al.  Verbal processes in shape recognition. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Edwin Martin,et al.  Meaningfulness and trigram recognition , 1970 .

[12]  H. Ellis,et al.  Attention and cue-producing responses in response-mediated stimulus generalization. , 1970 .

[13]  E. Gibson.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[14]  A. Paivio.  Mental imagery in associative learning and memory , 1969 .

[15]  James M. Royer.  Associative Recall as a Function of Stimulus Recognition , 1969 .

[16]  H. Ellis,et al.  Transfer of stimulus predifferentiation to shape recognition and identification learning: role of properties of verbal labels. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Retention of visual and verbal codes of the same stimuli. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  E. Martin,et al.  Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: an encoding variability hypothesis. , 1968, Psychological review.

[19]  H. Ellis,et al.  The role of response-produced cues in paired-associate transfer as a function of intralist stimulus similarity , 1968 .

[20]  J. Houston,et al.  Stimulus selection and retroactive inhibition. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  W. Runquist.  Functions relating intralist stimulus similarity to acquisition performance with a variety of materials , 1968 .

[22]  H. Ellis,et al.  Implicit verbal responses and the transfer of stimulus predifferentiation. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  B. Underwood,et al.  Differentiation among stimuli as a factor in transfer performance , 1968 .

[24]  E. Martin,et al.  Relation between stimulus recognition and paired-associate learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Benjamin Kleinmuntz,et al.  Concepts and the structure of memory , 1967 .

[26]  W Bevan,et al.  Stimulus variation and repetition in the acquisition of naming responses. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  C. T. James,et al.  Stimulus selection at different stages of paired-associate learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Edwin Martin,et al.  Stimulus recognition in aural paired-associate learning , 1967 .

[29]  W. Bevan,et al.  The effect of variation in specific stimuli on memory for their superordinates. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[30]  D. Kausler,et al.  Stimulus meaningfulness and unlearning in the A-B, A-C transfer paradigm. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  H. Ellis,et al.  Stimulus meaning and complexity as factors in the transfer of stimulus predifferentiation. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  R. L. Feuge,et al.  Transfer of predifferentiation training to gradients of generalization in shape recognition. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  J A McNulty,et al.  Short-term retention as a function of method of measurement, recording time, and meaningfulness of the material. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[34]  B. Underwood.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  H. J. Clark.  RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR RANDOM SHAPES AS A FUNCTION OF COMPLEXITY, ASSOCIATION VALUE, AND DELAY. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  B. Underwood,et al.  Studies of coding in verbal learning. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[37]  M. Glanzer,et al.  THE VERBAL-LOOP HYPOTHESIS: CONVENTIONAL FIGURES. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[38]  V. Stefflre,et al.  LANGUAGE AND COGNITION REVISITED. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  H. Ellis,et al.  TRANSFER IN PERCEPTUAL LEARNING FOLLOWING STIMULUS PREDIFFERENTIATION. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  H. Ellis,et al.  Evidence for Acquired Equivalence of Cues in a Perceptual Task , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[41]  J. M. Vanderplas,et al.  Some Task-Related Determinants of Transfer in Perceptual Learning , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[42]  P. Katz,et al.  EFFECTS OF LABELS ON CHILDREN'S PERCEPTION AND DISCRIMINATION LEARNING. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  H. B. Ranken.  Language and Thinking: Positive and Negative Effects of Naming , 1963, Science.

[44]  Neal E. Miller,et al.  Personality and Psychotherapy: An Analysis in Terms of Learning, Thinking, and Culture , 1963 .

[45]  J. M. Vanderplas.  Associative Processes and Task Relations in Perceptual Learning , 1963 .

[46]  H. Ellis,et al.  Recognition of Random Tactual Shapes following Predifferentiation Training , 1962 .

[47]  W. Mcguire.  A multiprocess model for paired-associate learning. , 1961 .

[48]  S. M. Pfafflin,et al.  Stimulus meaning in stimulus predifferentiation. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  D. Cappon,et al.  Preliminary Study of Endurance and Perceptual Change in Sleep Deprivation , 1960 .

[50]  J. M. Vanderplas,et al.  Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired associates training. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  N. Greenfeld,et al.  Transfer to a motor task as influenced by conditions and degree of prior discrimination training. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[52]  M D ARNOULT,et al.  Stimulus predifferentiation: some generalizations and hypotheses. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  Eriksen Cw,et al.  Role of response variables in recognition and identification of complex visual forms , 1956 .

[54]  Glen Finch,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON AIR FORCE HUMAN ENGINEERING, PERSONNEL, AND TRAINING RESEARCH , 1956 .

[55]  J. T. Freeman,et al.  Some Functions of Experimentally-Induced Language in Perceptual Learning , 1955 .

[56]  H W HAKE,et al.  Effect of number of permissible response categories on learning of a constant number of visual stimuli. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  J. S. Robinson.  The effect of learning verbal labels for stimuli on their later discrimination. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  E. Lenneberg,et al.  A study in language and cognition. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[59]  W. C. Prentice,et al.  Visual recognition of verbally labeled figures. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[60]  C. Noble.  An analysis of meaning. , 1952, Psychological review.

[61]  R. Gagne,et al.  Stimulus pre-differentiation as a factor in transfer of training. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  E. Gibson.  A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning , 1940 .

[63]  L. Carmichael,et al.  An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. , 1932 .

[64]  J. Glaze,et al.  The Association Value of Non-Sense Syllables , 1928 .

[65]  Roger T. Davis.  Memory for Form , 1974 .

[66]  Henry C. Ellis,et al.  Meaningfulness, perceptual grouping, and organization in recognition memory , 1974 .

[67]  E. Tulving,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context , 1971 .

[68]  J. Richardson.  Cue effectiveness and abstraction in paired-associate learning. , 1971 .

[69]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Abstraction and The Process of Recognition , 1970 .

[70]  E. Martin,et al.  Forced stimulus encoding and retroactive interference , 1970 .

[71]  B. Underwood,et al.  Encoding variability: Tests of the Martin hypothesis , 1970 .

[72]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Models Of Human Memory , 1970 .

[73]  R. L. Feuge,et al.  Generalization gradients in recognition memory of visual form: The role of stimulus meaning , 1969 .

[74]  T. Dixon,et al.  Verbal behavior and general behavior theory , 1968 .

[75]  Howard H. Kendler,et al.  Mediation and Conceptual Behavior , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[76]  Harley A. Bernbach,et al.  Stimulus learning and recognition in paired-associate learning. , 1967 .

[77]  A. Treisman.  SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN MAN. , 1964, British medical bulletin.

[78]  C. C. Spiker.  Verbal factors in the discrimination learning of children. , 1963, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[79]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Accuracy of perceptual recall: An analysis of organization , 1963 .

[80]  H. Kendler,et al.  Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. , 1962, Psychological review.

[81]  D. Lawrence.  The nature of a stimulus: Some relationships between learning and perception. , 1962 .

[82]  E. James Archer,et al.  Re-evaluation of the meaningfulness of all possible CVC trigrams. , 1960 .

[83]  G. A. Miller.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[84]  A. Goss.  A stimulus-response analysis of the interaction of cue-producing and instrumental responses. , 1955, Psychological review.

[85]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual Learning: Differentiation or Enrichment? , 2022 .