Solar disinfection of contaminated water: a comparison of three small-scale reactors

This paper compares three different collector shapes for the disinfection of water heavily contaminated with Escherichia coli (K-12). Tests were carried out in real sunlight using laboratory scale reactors to determine the performance of different reflector profiles. The reactors were constructed using Pyrex tubing and aluminium reflectors of compound parabolic, parabolic and V-groove profiles. Results have shown that the compound parabolic reflector promoted a more successful inactivation of E. coli than the parabolic and V-groove profiles. Tests were also carried out to assess the improvement to disinfection which could be achieved using TiO2 coated Pyrex rods fixed within the reactors. This technique, however, yielded a slight enhancement in the compound parabolic reactor but no benefit to overall disinfection performance in either the parabolic or V-groove reactors. These results show that the use of UV sunlight to disinfect contaminated drinking water in a full-scale continuous flow solar reactor is both promising and an appropriate technology for developing countries but that the inclusion of a fixed photocatalyst within the reactor tubes has yet to prove any significant improvement. � 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Karl W. Böer,et al.  Advances in Solar Energy , 1985 .

[2]  Cesar Pulgarin,et al.  Photocatalytical inactivation of E. coli: effect of (continuous-intermittent) light intensity and of (suspended-fixed) TiO2 concentration , 2003 .

[3]  H. Chick,et al.  An Investigation of the Laws of Disinfection , 1908, Journal of Hygiene.

[4]  J. Blanco,et al.  Photocatalytic treatment of water-soluble pesticides by photo-Fenton and TiO2 using solar energy , 2002 .

[5]  D. Robert,et al.  Solar photocatalysis: a clean process for water detoxification. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Julián Blanco,et al.  Photocatalysis with solar energy at a pilot-plant scale: an overview , 2002 .

[7]  Sandy Cairncross,et al.  Environmental Health Engineering in the Tropics: An Introductory Text , 1983 .

[8]  S. S. Block,et al.  Chemically Enhanced Sunlight for Killing Bacteria , 1997 .

[9]  F. Salih Enhancement of solar inactivation of Escherichia coli by titanium dioxide photocatalytic oxidation , 2002, Journal of applied microbiology.

[10]  Kevin G McGuigan,et al.  Solar disinfection of drinking water and diarrhoea in Maasai children: a controlled field trial , 1996, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Romero,et al.  Solar photocatalysis for detoxification and disinfection of contaminated water: pilot plant studies , 1999 .

[12]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[13]  A. Acra,et al.  Water Disinfection by Solar Radiation: Assessment and Application , 1989 .

[14]  T. Albanis,et al.  Photocatalytic transformation of pesticides in aqueous titanium dioxide suspensions using artificial and solar light: intermediates and degradation pathways , 2003 .

[15]  D. Goswami A Review of Engineering Developments of Aqueous Phase Solar Photocatalytic Detoxification and Disinfection Processes , 1997 .

[16]  A. Vidal,et al.  High‐Performance, Low‐Cost Solar Collectors for Disinfection of Contaminated Water , 2000, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[17]  Martin Wegelin,et al.  SODIS-AN EMERGING WATER TREATMENT PROCESS , 1997 .