Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: Iconically or morphologically determined?

Abstract In American Sign Language (ASL), many verbs inflected for subject and object agreement are highly iconic. Two models of the acquisition of verb agreement are compared. The first assumes that children's acquisition of agreement is guided by the global iconic properties of such verbs and the second assumes that acquisition is sensitive to the internal morphological organization of these inflected verbs. The contrasting predictions of these two models were tested by an elicited imitation experiment. Deaf children who were native learners of ASL were asked to imitate sign utterances containing agreeing verbs. The results confirm the predictions of the morphological model.

[1]  E. Schwam.  "More" is "less": sign language comprehension in deaf and hearing children. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  R. Kantor.  Communicative Interaction: Mother Modification and Child Acquisition of American Sign Language , 2013 .

[3]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[4]  H Poizner,et al.  Visual and "phonetic" coding of movement: evidence from American sign language. , 1981, Science.

[5]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[6]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  WORD ORDER AND PARTICLES IN THE ACQUISITION OF JAPANESE , 1977 .

[7]  M. Shand,et al.  Sign-based short-term coding of American Sign Language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  From Gesture To Sign: Deixis In A Visual-Gestural Language1 , 1983 .

[9]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gestural communication in deaf children: noneffect of parental input on language development. , 1983, Science.

[10]  Ferdinand de Saussure.  Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .

[11]  D. Slobin.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[12]  Bonnie Gough,et al.  Verbs in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[13]  C. F. Hockett.  The origin of speech. , 1960, Scientific American.

[14]  R. Brown,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF SYNTAX. , 1964, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[15]  Scott K. Liddell.  THINK AND BELIEVE: SEQUENTIALITY IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1984 .

[16]  U Bellugi,et al.  Representation of inflected signs from American Sign Language in short-term memory , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[17]  R. Berman,et al.  Regularity vs anomaly: the acquisition of Hebrew inflectional morphology. , 1981, Journal of child language.

[18]  Lynn A. Friedman,et al.  Space, Time, and Person Reference in American Sign Language. , 1975 .

[19]  R. P. Meier,et al.  Icons, analogues, and morphemes : the acquisition of verb agreement in American sign language , 1983 .

[20]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  ELICITED IMITATION AS A RESEARCH TOOL IN DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLINGUISTICS. , 1967 .

[21]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  R. Brown.  A First Language , 1973 .

[23]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children , 1975, Journal of Child Language.