Economic Valuation of Low-Load Operation with Auxiliary Firing of Coal-Fired Units

It is often claimed that coal-fired units are highly inflexible to accommodate variable renewable energy. However, a recently published report illustrates that making existing coal-fired units more flexible is both technically and economically feasible. Auxiliary firing is an effective and promising measure for coal-fired units to reduce their minimum loads and thus augment their flexibility. To implement the economic valuation of low-load operation with auxiliary firing (LLOAF) of coal-fired units, we improve the traditional fuel cost model to express the operating costs of LLOAF and present the economic criterion and economic index to assess the economics of LLOAF for a single coal-fired unit. Moreover, we investigate the economic value of LLOAF in the power system operation via day-ahead unit commitment problem and analyze the impacts on the scheduling results from unit commitment policies and from extra auxiliary fuel costs. Numerical simulations show that with the reduction of the extra auxiliary fuel costs LLOAF of coal-fired units can remarkably decrease the total operating costs of the power system. Some further conclusions are finally drawn.

[1]  Gang Li,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of the Medium-Term Units Commitment of Thermal Power , 2015 .

[2]  M. Milligan,et al.  Integrating Variable Renewable Energy: Challenges and Solutions , 2013 .

[3]  Anastasios G. Bakirtzis,et al.  Stochastic and Deterministic Unit Commitment Considering Uncertainty and Variability Reserves for High Renewable Integration , 2017 .

[4]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  D. Blayney,et al.  Challenges and solutions. , 2007, Journal of oncology practice.

[6]  Andrew Hoadley,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of oxy-fuel power plant system , 2015 .

[7]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Hidden power system inflexibilities imposed by traditional unit commitment formulations , 2017 .

[8]  Lei Wu A Tighter Piecewise Linear Approximation of Quadratic Cost Curves for Unit Commitment Problems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Daniel Kirschen,et al.  A hybrid stochastic/interval approach to transmission-constrained unit commitment , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[10]  H. Madsen,et al.  From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production , 2009 .

[11]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[12]  Sangmin Lee,et al.  A Computational Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Optimization in Unit Commitment With Wind Power Generation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  M. O'Malley,et al.  A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Song Gao,et al.  Research and Application of the Sequential Control Logic of Micro Oil Ignition System for Opposed Firing Supercritical Boiler , 2016 .

[15]  P. Attaviriyanupap,et al.  A Hybrid EP and SQP for Dynamic Economic Dispatch with Nonsmooth Fuel Cost Function , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[16]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Correlated wind-power production and electric load scenarios for investment decisions , 2013 .