Design of a 3-DOF parallel mechanism for the enhancement of endonasal surgery

Additive manufacturing was used to build a large scale prototype of a 3-DOF, 3-PRS parallel manipulator designed for enhancing the mobility of instruments used in endonasal neurosurgery. The prototype is 5 times larger than the design, with an outer diameter of 25mm. It uses custom ball and socket joints to provide pitch and roll capabilities of ±60° while remaining compact. Testing of the robots range of motion shows the desired workspace is achievable. Visual tracking was used to record the precision of this motion. Positioning errors were relatively low with a root mean squared error of 1.1°. The prototype exhibits high strength and is able to withstand axial forces of 80 N and torques up to 300 N mm. Future research will focus on the development of a 5 mm diameter manipulator.

[1]  A. Okamura Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[2]  D. Caleb Rucker,et al.  A Geometrically Exact Model for Externally Loaded Concentric-Tube Continuum Robots , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  Paul Breedveld,et al.  DragonFlex – Smart Steerable Laparoscopic Instrument , 2013 .

[4]  P Berti,et al.  Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. , 2001, Surgery.

[5]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[6]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  R. Webster,et al.  Robotic surgery for the sinuses and skull base: what are the possibilities and what are the obstacles? , 2013, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[8]  Zeng-Guang Hou,et al.  A 3-DOF compact haptic interface for endoscopic endonasal approach surgery simulation , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[9]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Design, development and analysis of a haptic-enabled modular flexure-based manipulator , 2016 .

[10]  Giada Gerboni,et al.  HelixFlex : bioinspired maneuverable instrument for skull base surgery , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  M. Ewend,et al.  Safety of Minimally Invasive Pituitary Surgery (MIPS) Compared with a Traditional Approach , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  M. Morgan,et al.  A cadaveric study of the endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to the basilar artery , 2013, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[13]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Optimal design for the micro parallel robot MIPS , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[14]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Physics-Based Haptic Simulation of Bone Machining , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[15]  Bijan Shirinzadeh,et al.  Motion control analysis of a parallel robot assisted minimally invasive surgery/microsurgery system (PRAMiSS) , 2013 .

[16]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Kinematic analysis of a 3-PRS parallel manipulator , 2007 .

[17]  S. Maeso,et al.  Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of Laparoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[18]  B Shirinzadeh,et al.  A force‐sensing surgical tool with a proximally located force/torque sensor , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[19]  D. Geller,et al.  World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection—2,804 Patients , 2009, Annals of surgery.