So What Does This Show Us? Analysis of the Discourse Marker "So" in Monologic Talk

Analysis of a series of computer science seminars indicates that use of the discourse marker ‘so’ in monologic talk is not random, rather it plays an important role in orienting the listener to the overall structure of the seminar. Although the institutional nature of seminar talk is such that only one person speaks for an extended turn, detailed analysis of seminars indicates that presenters do not maintain a continuous stream of talk. They talk for a bit, pause, and then talk for a bit more. These bits of talk (or sections) are characterised by a number of features, including discourse markers. The analysis shows how the discourse marker ‘so’ occurs in specific environments, with specific prosodic features, and that its role and function varies according to where it occurs within the seminar. The close interaction between talk (in this case, presenters’ use of ‘so’), and action (in this case, putting slides on the overhead projector), is also made apparent.

[1]  J. Richards,et al.  The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures. , 1986 .

[2]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[3]  Wallace L. Chafe,et al.  The flow of thought and the flow of language , 1977 .

[4]  Andreas H. Jucker.  The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account , 1993 .

[5]  Johanna Rendle-Short,et al.  Discourse markers in computer science seminar talk , 1998 .

[6]  J. Heritage,et al.  Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed , 1980 .

[7]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Interaction and grammar: “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists , 1996 .

[8]  E. M. Segal,et al.  The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple stories , 1991 .

[9]  John Flowerdew,et al.  The Effect of Discourse Markers on Second Language Lecture Comprehension , 1995, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Structures of Social Action: On doing “being ordinary” , 1985 .

[11]  J. Gumperz.  Discourse strategies: Subject index , 1982 .

[12]  Johanna Rendle-Short.  When “okay” is okay in computer science seminar talk , 1999 .

[13]  B. Fraser.  An approach to discourse markers , 1990 .

[14]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[15]  Charles Goodwin.  Interaction and grammar: Transparent vision , 1996 .

[16]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .