A least-squares based pseudoinversion approach for non hyperbolic linear systems

A new method to achieve an accurate output tracking for nonminimum phase linear systems with nonhyperbolic or near nonhyperbolic internal dynamics is presented. For the classical methods, developed in the framework of the preview based stable inversion, the nonhyperbolicity represents a rather serious inconvenience because the required preactuation time tends to become unacceptably large. Different stable inversion techniques, developed for SISO systems, are based on a proper redefinition of the desired output trajectory with the aim of canceling the undesired effects of unstable zeros. The main purpose of the new approach is to alleviate some theoretical and practical limitations inherent in the above methods. The desired output is here partitioned into the transient and steady-state components. The desired output to be exactly tracked in steady-state is assumed to belong to the set of polynomials, exponential and sinusoidal time functions. The transient input is “a priori” assumed to be given by a spline function. Once the desired output trajectory has been specified, this allows the computation of the unknown transient input as the approximate least-squares solution of the Fredholm's integral equation corresponding to the explicit formula of the output forced response. The steady-state input is analytically computed exploiting the steady-state output response expressions for inputs belonging to the same set of the desired steady-state output.

[1]  Qingze Zou Optimal preview-based stable-inversion for output tracking of nonminimum-phase linear systems , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  K. R. Goheen,et al.  Linear quadratic optimal model‐following control of a helicopter in hover , 1996 .

[3]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Inversion-based optimal output tracking-transition switching with preview for nonminimum-phase linear systems , 2012, Autom..

[4]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Output tracking with nonhyperbolic and near nonhyperbolic internal dynamics: helicopter hover control , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[5]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Preview-Based Stable-Inversion for Output Tracking of Linear Systems , 1999 .

[6]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Precision preview-based stable-inversion for nonlinear nonminimum-phase systems: The VTOL example , 2007, Autom..

[7]  C. Desoer,et al.  Linear Time-Invariant Robust Servomechanism Problem: A Self-Contained Exposition , 1980 .

[8]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[9]  Mouhacine Benosman,et al.  Stable inversion of SISO nonminimum phase linear systems through output planning: an experimental application to the one-link flexible manipulator , 2003, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[10]  M. Vakil,et al.  PIECE-WISE CAUSAL INVERSION BY OUTPUT REDEFINITION FOR A FLEXIBLE LINK MANIPULATOR , 2009 .

[11]  Jeff K. Pieper,et al.  Linear-quadratic optimal model-following control of a helicopter in hover , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[12]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Nonlinear minimum-time control with pre- and post-actuation , 2011, Autom..

[13]  Valentina Orsini,et al.  Almost perfect tracking through mixed numerical-analytical stable pseudo-inversion of non minimum phase plants , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Optimal output-transitions for linear systems , 2003, Autom..

[15]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Robots with Flexible Elements , 2016, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[16]  Aurelio Piazzi,et al.  Using stable input-output inversion for minimum-time feedforward constrained regulation of scalar systems , 2005, Autom..

[17]  Valentina Orsini,et al.  A mixed numerical–analytical stable pseudo‐inversion method aimed at attaining an almost exact tracking , 2015 .