Use of Synchronous Virtual Classrooms: Why, Who, and How?

Virtual classrooms allow students and instructors to communicate synchronously using features such as audio, video, text chat, interactive whiteboard, and application sharing. The purpose of the study reported in this paper was to identify why instructors adopt synchronous virtual classrooms and how they use them after their adoption. An electronic survey was administered asking instructors from various institutions to describe their experience adopting a synchronous virtual classroom in either a blended or online course. In describing their reasons for adopting the technology, respondents most frequently cited institutional resource availability, increasing social presence, enhancing student learning, and the availability of technology. Along with audio chat, the features that most influenced the adoption of virtual classrooms and were used most frequently by respondents were the ability to archive conference sessions, see participants through webcams, and use text-based chat interfaces. Open-ended survey responses revealed that instructors used virtual classrooms to promote interactivity, develop community, and reach students at different locations. There were also distinct trends characterizing the demographics of faculty members who reported using virtual classrooms. These findings provide meaningful data for instructors interested in providing synchronous components in their online teaching and for administrators interested in promoting technology-enhanced learning on their campuses.

[1]  Carol S Sternberger,et al.  Think globally, learn locally: Multimedia conferencing between two schools of nursing. , 2011, Nursing education perspectives.

[2]  David C. Yen,et al.  Determinants of users' intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Gary Motteram,et al.  The role of synchronous communication in fully distance education , 2001 .

[4]  David Spann 5 innovative ways to use virtual classrooms in Higher Education , 2012 .

[5]  Shauna Schullo,et al.  Using Synchronous Software in Web-based Nursing Courses , 2006, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[6]  K. Peterson,et al.  The Professional Development of Principals: Innovations and Opportunities , 2002 .

[7]  Mary Ann Bowman,et al.  Gender and use of instructional technologies: A study of university faculty , 1997 .

[8]  Donald E. Zimmerman,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Adoption of Software and Hardware by Faculty in the Liberal Arts and Sciences , 2006 .

[9]  Florence Martin,et al.  Examining Interactivity in Synchronous Virtual Classrooms. , 2012 .

[10]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Barbara J. Mann,et al.  Breaking out of the Asynchronous Box: Using Web Conferencing in Distance Learning , 2009 .

[12]  S. King,et al.  Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course , 2008, Medical teacher.

[13]  Jeff Seaman,et al.  Conflicted: Faculty and Online Education, 2012. , 2012 .

[14]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Is Online Life a Breeze? A Case Study for Promoting Synchronous Learning in a Blended Graduate Course , 2007 .

[15]  D. Hinkle,et al.  Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[16]  Patricia L. Baia,et al.  The role of commitment to pedagogical quality: The adoption of instructional technology in higher education , 2009 .

[17]  Phyllis Jones,et al.  Virtual Spaces: Employing a Synchronous Online Classroom to Facilitate Student Engagement in Online Learning , 2009 .

[18]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[19]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning , 2008 .

[20]  Deborah K. LaPointe,et al.  Speak2Me: Using Synchronous Audio for ESL Teaching in Taiwan , 2004 .

[21]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Exploring technology acceptance for mobile services , 2011 .

[22]  Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw,et al.  Web 2.0 Technologies: Facilitating Interaction in an Online Human Services Counseling Skills Course , 2009 .

[23]  Xue Bai,et al.  The Importance of Synchronous Interaction for Student Satisfaction with Course Web Sites , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[24]  Chris Sturm,et al.  Faculty Adoption of Technology: The Use of Elluminate Live , 2011 .

[25]  Lei Li,et al.  Does it Really Matter? Using Virtual Office Hours to Enhance Student-Faculty Interaction , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[26]  Kwok Chi Ng,et al.  Replacing Face-to-Face Tutorials by Synchronous Online Technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications , 2007 .

[27]  Belgin Aydin,et al.  An e-class application in a Distance English Language Teacher Training program (DELTT): Turkish learners' perceptions , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[28]  Birgit Loch,et al.  The practice of web conferencing: Where are we now? , 2008 .

[29]  Birgit Loch,et al.  CONDUCTING A TRIAL OF WEB CONFERENCING SOFTWARE: Why, How, and Perceptions from the Coalface , 2008 .

[30]  Olivera Marjanovic,et al.  Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Morgan Jennings,et al.  The Use of Desktop Video Conferencing as a Medium for Collaboration Between Beginning Instructional Designers and Intern Teachers , 2001 .

[32]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Supporting Synchronous Distance Language Learning with Desktop Videoconferencing , 2004 .

[33]  Lori Foster Thompson,et al.  Web-Based Instruction: Who is Inclined to Resist it and Why? , 2003 .

[34]  Diane Phillips,et al.  Teaching and learning: flexible modes and technology applications , 2007 .

[35]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  Robin E Pattillo Decreasing Transactional Distance in a Web-Based Course , 2007, Nurse educator.

[37]  Punya Mishra,et al.  Teacher moderating and student engagement in synchronous computer conferences , 2005 .

[38]  N. Kock,et al.  Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[39]  Florence Martin,et al.  Using Virtual Classrooms: Student Perceptions of Features and Characteristics in an Online and a Blended Course , 2010 .

[40]  Faruk Aras,et al.  3D Virtual Classroom Environment for Teaching Renewable Energy Production and Substation Equipment , 2011 .

[41]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Jonathan E. Finkelstein Learning in Real Time: Synchronous Teaching and Learning Online , 2006 .