Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to movements of vibrissae in different directions.

The response properties of 123 trigeminal ganglion neurons were studied, using controlled whisker deflections in different directions. When the distal end of the whisker was initially displaced 5.7 degrees (1 mm) from its neutral position, 81% of the cells responded with statistically more spikes/stimulus to movements in one to three of eight cardinal (45 degrees increment) directions than to the others. The more directionally selective the cell, the more vigorous was its response. On the basis of statistical criteria, 75% of the cells were classified as slowly adapting, 25% as rapidly adapting. A number of quantitative analyses indicated that slowly adapting units respond more selectively than rapidly adapting cells to the direction of whisker movement. Differences in directional sensitivities of rapidly and slowly adapting cells appear to parallel differences between their putative mechanoreceptive endings and the relationships between those endings and the vibrissa follicle's structure. Comparisons between the response properties of peripheral and central neurons in the vibrissa-lemniscal system indicate that the afferent neural signal is progressively and substantially transformed by mechanisms that function to integrate information from different peripheral receptors and from different, individual vibrissae.

[1]  S. B. Vincent The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat , 1912 .

[2]  S. B. Vincent,et al.  The tactile hair of the white rat , 1913 .

[3]  O Fitzgerald,et al.  Discharges from the sensory organs of the cat's vibrissae and the modification in their activity by ions , 1940, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[5]  W. Welker Analysis of Sniffing of the Albino Rat 1) , 1964 .

[6]  F. W. Kerr,et al.  SOMATOTOPIC ORGANIZATION OF TRIGEMINAL-GANGLION NEURONES. , 1964, Archives of neurology.

[7]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Structure and function of the tactile hair receptors on the cat's foreleg. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  W. Welker,et al.  Coding of somatic sensory input by vibrissae neurons in the rat's trigeminal ganglion. , 1969, Brain research.

[9]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. , 1970, Brain research.

[10]  J. Hahn,et al.  Stimulus—response relationships in first‐order sensory fibres from cat vibrissae , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  C. Welker Microelectrode delineation of fine grain somatotopic organization of (SmI) cerebral neocortex in albino rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[12]  P J Donovick,et al.  Opossum trigeminal afferents associated with vibrissa and rhinarial mechanoreceptors. , 1973, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[13]  P. Waite The responses of cells in the rat thalamus to mechanical movements of the whiskers , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Iggo,et al.  Functional characteristics of mechanoreceptors in sinus hair follicles of the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Shipley,et al.  Response characteristics of single units in the rat's trigeminal nuclei to vibrissa displacements. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  S. Ojeda,et al.  A rapid and simple procedure for chronic cannulation of the rat jugular vein. , 1974, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  R. Dykes Afferent fibers from mystacial vibrissae of cats and seals. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  T. Woolsey,et al.  A proportional relationship between peripheral innervation density and cortical neuron number in the somatosensory system of the mouse , 1975, Brain Research.

[19]  K. Gottschaldt,et al.  Quantitative aspects of responses in trigeminal relay neurones and interneurones following mechanical stimulation of sinus hairs and skin in the cat , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  K. Gottschaldt,et al.  Properties of different functional types of neurones in the cat's rostral trigeminal nuclei responding to sinus hair stimulation , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. Simons Response properties of vibrissa units in rat SI somatosensory neocortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Ito Some quantitative aspects of vibrissa-driven neuronal responses in rat neocortex. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  K. Gottschaldt,et al.  Merkel cell receptors: structure and transducer function. , 1981, Science.

[24]  D. Simons,et al.  9 – Somatosensory Development , 1981 .

[25]  D. Simons Multi-whisker stimulation and its effects on vibrissa units in rat Sml barrel cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[26]  J. M. Gibson,et al.  Quantitative studies of stimulus coding in first-order vibrissa afferents of rats. 2. Adaptation and coding of stimulus parameters. , 1983, Somatosensory research.

[27]  J M Gibson,et al.  Quantitative studies of stimulus coding in first-order vibrissa afferents of rats. 1. Receptive field properties and threshold distributions. , 1983, Somatosensory research.

[28]  D. Simons Temporal and spatial integration in the rat SI vibrissa cortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  J. Dörfl The innervation of the mystacial region of the white mouse: A topographical study. , 1985, Journal of anatomy.

[30]  C. Lin,et al.  Glutamic acid decarboxylase immunoreactivity in layer IV of barrel cortex of rat and mouse , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  B. Munger,et al.  A comparative light microscopic analysis of the sensory innervation of the mystacial pad. I. Innervation of vibrissal follicle‐sinus complexes , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  R. Masterton,et al.  The sensory contribution of a single vibrissa's cortical barrel. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  M. Jacquin,et al.  Structure‐function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris. I. Vibrissa primary afferents , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  Anita E. Hendrickson,et al.  Local circuit neurons in the rat ventrobasal thalamus—A gaba immunocytochemical study , 1987, Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Ito,et al.  Response properties and topography of vibrissa-sensitive VPM neurons in the rat. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  D. Simons,et al.  Thalamocortical response transformation in the rat vibrissa/barrel system. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.