Who's next? A new process for creating points systems for prioritising patients for elective health services

We describe a new process for creating points systems for prioritising patients for elective health services. Beginning in 2004, the authors were closely involved in a project to develop the process, initially for coronary artery bypass graft surgery and then successively for other elective services. The project was led by New Zealand's Ministry of Health in collaboration with the relevant clinical professional organisations. The objective was to overcome the limitations of earlier methodologies and to create points systems that are valid and reproducible and based on a consensus of clinical judgements. As the project progressed and the process was refined, other points systems were successively created (and clinically endorsed) for hip and knee replacements, varicose veins surgery, cataract surgery, gynaecology, plastic surgery, otorhinolaryngology, and heart valve surgery. Other points systems are planned for the future. Since 2008 the process has also been used in the public health systems of Canada's western provinces. The process is explained in a step-by-step manner so that others are able to follow it to create their own points systems if desired

[1]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Wilson.  Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[3]  Tom Noseworthy,et al.  Relative urgency for referral from primary care to rheumatologists: The Priority Referral Score , 2011, Arthritis care & research.

[4]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[5]  A. MacCormick,et al.  Prioritizing patients for elective surgery: a systematic review , 2003, ANZ journal of surgery.

[6]  K Ramanathan,et al.  Waiting times and prioritisation for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand , 1999 .

[7]  P. Hansen,et al.  A new method for scoring additive multi‐attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives , 2008 .

[8]  D C Hadorn,et al.  The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview , 1997, BMJ.

[9]  M Ryan,et al.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[10]  Paul Hansen,et al.  Health technology prioritization: which criteria for prioritizing new technologies and what are their relative weights? , 2011, Health policy.

[11]  T Halliwell,et al.  How fair is cataract prioritisation? , 1998, The New Zealand medical journal.

[12]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[13]  J. Singh,et al.  Bringing It All Together: A Novel Approach to the Development of Response Criteria for Chronic Gout Clinical Trials , 2011, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[14]  D C Hadorn,et al.  Waiting for scheduled services in Canada: development of priority-setting scoring systems. , 2003, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[15]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[16]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care , 2008 .

[17]  A. Silman,et al.  The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  D C Hadorn,et al.  The new zealand priority criteria project. part 2: coronary artery bypass graft surgery , 1997, BMJ.

[19]  B R Parry,et al.  Priority access criteria for elective cholecystectomy: a comparison of three scoring methods. , 1998, The New Zealand medical journal.