Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction.

PURPOSE To measure prospectively and directly both organ dose and effective dose (ED) for adult cardiac and pulmonary computed tomographic (CT) angiography by using current clinical protocols for 64-detector CT in an anthropomorphic female phantom and to estimate lifetime attributable risk of breast and lung cancer incidence on the basis of measured ED and organ dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cardiac and pulmonary 64-detector CT angiography was performed by using current clinical protocols to evaluate the pulmonary veins (electrocardiographically [ECG] gated, 64 sections at 0.625-mm collimation, 120 kVp, 300 mA, 0.35-second tube rotation), native coronary arteries (ECG gated; 64 sections at 0.625 mm; 120 kVp; maximum current, 500-750 mA; minimum, 100-350 mA; 0.35-second tube rotation) and pulmonary embolus (64 sections at 1.25 mm, 140 kVp, 645 mA, 0.5-second tube rotation). Absorbed organ doses were measured by using an anthropomorphic female phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor detectors. ED was calculated from measured organ doses and the dose-length product. RESULTS ED for current adult cardiac and pulmonary 64-detector CT angiography protocols were 12.4-31.8 mSv. Overall, skin, breast, and esophagus and heart had the highest recorded absorbed organ doses. Relative risk for breast cancer incidence for girls and women was 1.004-1.042 for a single examination. Relative risk for lung cancer incidence for men and women was 1.005-1.076 from a single examination. CONCLUSION EDs and organ doses from 64-detector CT are higher than those previously reported for adult cardiac and pulmonary CT angiography protocols. Risk for breast and lung cancer induction from these studies is greatest for the younger patient population.

[1]  E. Coche,et al.  Pulmonary embolism: radiation dose with multi-detector row CT and digital angiography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[2]  E. Paulson,et al.  Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  M. Little,et al.  Comparison of breast cancer incidence in the Massachusetts tuberculosis fluoroscopy cohort and in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. , 1999, Radiation research.

[4]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Measurement of half-value layer in x-ray CT: a comparison of two noninvasive techniques. , 2000 .

[5]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[6]  U. Mödder,et al.  Dose Reduction in Multi-slice CT of the Heart by Use of ECG-controlled Tube Current Modulation (“ECG pulsing”): Phantom Measurements , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  A K Dixon,et al.  16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  R. Truyen,et al.  Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  C. Canter,et al.  Selective Coronary Angiography in Pediatric Patients , 2000, Pediatric Cardiology.

[10]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  Peter Wilde,et al.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Cristy,et al.  Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  W. Teeuwisse,et al.  Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography , 2003, European Radiology.

[14]  C D Claussen,et al.  Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[15]  D. Gaffney,et al.  Does radiotherapy around the time of pregnancy for Hodgkin's disease modify the risk of breast cancer? , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Abdominal multislice CT for obese patients: effect on image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[17]  J. Rumberger,et al.  A rosetta stone for coronary calcium risk stratification: agatston, volume, and mass scores in 11,490 individuals. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Effective Dose Determination Using an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Technology for Clinical Adult Body Multidetector Array Computed Tomography Protocols , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.