A Multi-Platform Optical Sensor for In Vivo and In Vitro Algae Classification

Differentiation among major algal groups is important for the ecological and biogeochemical characterization of water bodies, and for practical management of water resources. It helps to discern the taxonomic groups that are beneficial to aquatic life from the organisms causing harmful algal blooms. An LED-induced fluorescence (LEDIF) instrument capable of fluorescence, absorbance, and scattering measurements; is used for in vivo and in vitro identification and quantification of four algal groups found in freshwater and marine environments. Aqueous solutions of individual and mixed dissolved biological pigments relevant to different algal groups were measured to demonstrate the LEDIF’s capabilities in measuring extracted pigments. Different genera of algae were cultivated and the cell counts of the samples were quantified with a hemacytometer and/or cellometer. Dry weight of different algae cells was also measured to determine the cell counts-to-dry weight correlations. Finally, in vivo measurements of different genus of algae at different cell concentrations and mixed algal group in the presence of humic acid were performed with the LEDIF. A field sample from a local reservoir was measured with the LEDIF and the results were verified using hemacytometer, cellometer, and microscope. The results demonstrated the LEDIF’s capabilities in classifying and quantifying different groups of live algae.

[1]  Chee-Loon Ng,et al.  A multi‐platform optical sensor for in situ sensing of water chemistry , 2012 .

[2]  Hugh L. MacIntyre,et al.  Spectral fluorometric characterization of phytoplankton community composition using the Algae Online Analyser. , 2010, Water research.

[3]  Phil F. Culverhouse,et al.  Automatic image analysis of plankton: future perspectives , 2006 .

[4]  Primo Coltelli,et al.  Water monitoring: automated and real time identification and classification of algae using digital microscopy. , 2014, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[5]  H. Hemond,et al.  Corrections for matrix effects on fluorescence measurement of a multi-platform optical sensor , 2016 .

[6]  Yves Bellouard,et al.  Optofluidic lab-on-a-chip for rapid algae population screening , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[7]  Yuan-Kun Lee,et al.  Determination of biomass dry weight of marine microalgae , 1997, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[8]  M. Moline,et al.  OPTICAL MONITORING AND FORECASTING SYSTEMS FOR HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: POSSIBILITY OR PIPE DREAM? , 1999 .

[9]  J. Lakowicz Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy , 1983 .

[10]  Chee-Loon Ng,et al.  Characterization and field test of an in situ multi‐platform optical sensor , 2014 .

[11]  H. Dau,et al.  A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[12]  J. T. Turner,et al.  Ecology of harmful algae , 2006 .

[13]  K. V. Embleton,et al.  Automated counting of phytoplankton by pattern recognition: a comparison with a manual counting method , 2003 .

[14]  Aishah Salleh,et al.  A preliminary study on automated freshwater algae recognition and classification system , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  Chuanmin Hu A novel ocean color index to detect floating algae in the global oceans , 2009 .

[16]  Mandar Chitre,et al.  In situ real-time optical sensing device for three-dimensional water chemistry surveillance , 2015 .