Dependence of normal brain integral dose and normal tissue complication probability on the prescription isodose values for gamma-knife radiosurgery.

A recent multi-institutional clinical study suggested possible benefits of lowering the prescription isodose lines for stereotactic radiosurgery procedures. In this study, we investigate the dependence of the normal brain integral dose and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) on the prescription isodose values for gamma-knife radiosurgery. An analytical dose model was developed for gamma-knife treatment planning. The dose model was commissioned by fitting the measured dose profiles for each helmet size. The dose model was validated by comparing its results with the Leksell gamma plan (LGP, version 5.30) calculations. The normal brain integral dose and the NTCP were computed and analysed for an ensemble of treatment cases. The functional dependence of the normal brain integral dose and the NCTP versus the prescribing isodose values was studied for these cases. We found that the normal brain integral dose and the NTCP increase significantly when lowering the prescription isodose lines from 50% to 35% of the maximum tumour dose. Alternatively, the normal brain integral dose and the NTCP decrease significantly when raising the prescribing isodose lines from 50% to 65% of the maximum tumour dose. The results may be used as a guideline for designing future dose escalation studies for gamma-knife applications.

[1]  P S Cho,et al.  A spherical dose model for radiosurgery plan optimization. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  L Souhami,et al.  Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  L. Verhey,et al.  Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on complication and control probabilities. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Models in radiotherapy: volume effects. , 1983, Medical physics.

[5]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Treatment planning for gamma knife radiosurgery with multiple isocenters. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. Flickinger,et al.  An integrated logistic formula for prediction of complications from radiosurgery. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  L. Verhey,et al.  Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on physical dose distributions. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  D. Shrieve,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy: new developments and new directions. , 1997, Seminars in oncology.

[9]  K. Stelzer,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery: a review and comparison of methods. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  A Brahme,et al.  Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  Ervin B. Podgorsak,et al.  Radiosurgery with high energy photon beams: a comparison among techniques. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.