Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report findings from two studies that compare the nature (construct validity) and relative effects (incremental predictive validity) of environmentally specific transformational leadership (ETFL) to general transformational leadership. Design/methodology/approach The nature of ETFL was investigated in an empirical study based on a sample of 185 employees. The relative effects of ETFL were examined in an experimental study based on a sample of 155 university students. Findings A confirmatory factor analysis showed that environmentally specific and general transformational leadership are empirically distinct but related. Findings from the experimental study revealed that compared to general transformational leadership and a control condition, participants exposed to ETFL he confederate leader’s environmental values and priorities more highly and engaged in higher levels of pro-environmental behaviors. Research limitations/implications Questions concerning ecological and external validity arise out of the experimental study. Future research should contrast the relative effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership across various organizational and cultural conditions. Limitations associated with demand characteristics are also of concern in the experimental study. Future research should include an environmental focus in the control condition to exclude any possible threats related to demand characteristics. Practical implications Results from these two studies provide useful information regarding within-organization environmental leadership training by suggesting that maximal individual and organizational environmental change may best be achieved by training leaders to be as specific as possible regarding their values, priorities and goals. Social implications This research suggests that leaders should engage in ETFL behaviors to have the greatest positive impact on corporate environmental sustainability, and by extension, climate change. Originality/value In two separate studies, the construct and incremental predictive validity of ETFL were assessed.

[1]  J. Robertson,et al.  The psychology of green organizations , 2015 .

[2]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions , 2014 .

[3]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Taking Responsibility for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Leaders in Creating, Implementing, Sustaining, or Avoiding Socially Responsible Firm Behaviors , 2014 .

[4]  J. Barling.  The Science of Leadership: Lessons from Research for Organizational Leaders , 2014 .

[5]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China , 2013 .

[6]  J. Robertson,et al.  Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors , 2013 .

[7]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Greening organizational behavior: An introduction to the special issue , 2013 .

[8]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  On the Importance of Pro-Environmental Organizational Climate for Employee Green Behavior , 2012, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[9]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  Environmental Sustainability at Work: A Call to Action , 2012, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[10]  S. Benn,et al.  Leadership for Sustainability: An Evolution of Leadership Ability , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[11]  Peter Lacy,et al.  Developing strategies and leaders to succeed in a new era of sustainability , 2012 .

[12]  Julian Barling,et al.  Pseudo-Transformational Leadership: Model Specification and Outcomes , 2011 .

[13]  D. Dierendonck,et al.  Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis , 2011 .

[14]  P. Stern.  Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[15]  E. Weber,et al.  Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[16]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Inconsistent style of leadership as a predictor of safety behaviour , 2011 .

[17]  Linda Steg,et al.  Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions , 2010 .

[18]  B. Zumbo,et al.  Development and Psychometric Properties of the Transformational Teaching Questionnaire , 2010, Journal of health psychology.

[19]  R. Burke,et al.  Predictor of Business Students’ Attitudes Toward Sustainable Business Practices , 2010 .

[20]  Alan E Kazdin,et al.  Psychological science's contributions to a sustainable environment: extending our reach to a grand challenge of society. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[21]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Safety leadership: A longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes , 2009 .

[22]  Stacey M. Conchie,et al.  The moderating role of safety-specific trust on the relation between safety-specific leadership and safety citizenship behaviors. , 2009, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[23]  Jesús Ángel del Brío,et al.  Human resources in advanced environmental approaches–a case analysis , 2008 .

[24]  Y. Fried,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF WORK DEMAND STRESSORS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING MAIN AND MODERATING EFFECTS , 2008 .

[25]  Mansour Javidan,et al.  Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[26]  Michael E. Brown,et al.  Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing , 2005 .

[27]  Douglas J. Brown,et al.  Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect , 2005 .

[28]  D. Zohar,et al.  Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  G. Fryxell,et al.  The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Values on Managerial Behaviours on Behalf of the Environment: An Empirical Examination of Managers in China , 2003 .

[30]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[31]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  B. Avolio,et al.  Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. , 2000 .

[33]  Sanjay Sharma.  Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[34]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[35]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[36]  C. Egri,et al.  Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector: Values, Leadership Styles, and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and their Organizations , 2000 .

[37]  Judith M. Collins,et al.  Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance , 2000 .

[38]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. , 1996 .

[39]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Comment: Transformational Leadership , 1995 .

[40]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. , 1989 .

[41]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[42]  Robert J. House,et al.  Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior , 1972 .

[43]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[44]  Stacey M. Conchie,et al.  Promoting safety voice with safety-specific transformational leadership: the mediating role of two dimensions of trust. , 2012, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[45]  A. Griffiths,et al.  The role of emotions in driving workplace pro-environmental behaviors , 2008 .

[46]  Jane Mullen,et al.  Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. , 2006, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[47]  Larry C. Spears,et al.  Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness, 25th anniversary ed. , 2002 .

[48]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[49]  P. Shrivastava.  Ecocentric leadership in the 21st century , 1994 .

[50]  G. Yukl,et al.  Perspectives on environmental leadership , 1994 .

[51]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[52]  Lynda A. King,et al.  Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity: A Critical Assessment of Construct Validity , 1990 .

[53]  M. Orne.  This Week's Citation Classic , 2022 .