Quick Response codes for surgical safety: a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND Surgical safety programs have been shown to reduce patient harm; however, there is variable compliance. The purpose of this study is to determine if innovative technology such as Quick Response (QR) codes can facilitate surgical safety initiatives. METHODS We prospectively evaluated the use of QR codes during the surgical time-out for 40 operations. Feasibility and accuracy were assessed. Perceptions of the current time-out process and the QR code application were evaluated through surveys using a 5-point Likert scale and binomial yes or no questions. RESULTS At baseline (n = 53), survey results from the surgical team agreed or strongly agreed that the current time-out process was efficient (64%), easy to use (77%), and provided clear information (89%). However, 65% of surgeons felt that process improvements were needed. Thirty-seven of 40 (92.5%) QR codes scanned successfully, of which 100% were accurate. Three scan failures resulted from excessive curvature or wrinkling of the QR code label on the body. Follow-up survey results (n = 33) showed that the surgical team agreed or strongly agreed that the QR program was clearer (70%), easier to use (57%), and more accurate (84%). Seventy-four percent preferred the QR system to the current time-out process. CONCLUSIONS QR codes accurately transmit patient information during the time-out procedure and are preferred to the current process by surgical team members. The novel application of this technology may improve compliance, accuracy, and outcomes.

[1]  E. Verdaasdonk,et al.  Requirements for the design and implementation of checklists for surgical processes , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Philip F Stahel,et al.  Wrong-site and wrong-patient procedures in the universal protocol era: analysis of a prospective database of physician self-reported occurrences. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[3]  Shilo Anders,et al.  Novel use of electronic whiteboard in the operating room increases surgical team compliance with pre-incision safety practices. , 2012, Surgery.

[4]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[5]  Lillian S Kao,et al.  Implementing a surgical checklist: more than checking a box. , 2012, Surgery.

[6]  W. Berry,et al.  A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  D. Longo,et al.  The long road to patient safety: a status report on patient safety systems. , 2005, JAMA.

[8]  C-H Lin,et al.  The feasibility of QR‐code prescription in Taiwan , 2012, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[9]  Rebecca L. Johnson,et al.  Completion of the surgical safety checklist: A job poorly done! , 2012 .

[10]  C Vijayasekar,et al.  The World Health Organization's surgical safety checklist. , 2009, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[11]  Fang Liu,et al.  QR code for medical information uses. , 2008, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[12]  Shilin Chen,et al.  DNA Barcode Goes Two-Dimensions: DNA QR Code Web Server , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Pieter L Kubben QR codes in neurosurgery , 2011, Surgical neurology international.

[14]  Brenda L Carney,et al.  Evolution of wrong site surgery prevention strategies. , 2006, AORN journal.

[15]  Peter J. Pronovost,et al.  Achieving the National Quality Forum's “Never Events”: Prevention of Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, and Wrong Patient Operations , 2007, Annals of surgery.