Oxyfuel carbonation/calcination cycle for low cost CO2 capture in existing power plants

Abstract Postcombustion CO 2 capture is the best suitable capture technology for existing coal power plants. This paper focuses on an emerging technology that involves the separation of CO 2 using the reversible carbonation reaction of CaO to capture CO 2 from the flue gas, and the calcination of CaCO 3 to regenerate the sorbent and produce concentrated CO 2 for storage. We describe the application to this concept to an existing (with today’s technology) power plant. The added capture system incorporates a new supercritical steam cycle to take advantage of the large amount of heat coming out from the high temperature capture process (oxyfired combustion of coal is needed in the CaCO 3 calciner). In these conditions, the capture system is able to generate additional power (26.7% efficiency respect to LHV coal input to the calciner after accounting for all the penalties in the overall system), without disturbing the steam cycle of the reference plant (that retains its 44.9 efficiency). A preliminary cost study of the overall system, using well established analogues in the open literature for the main components, yields capture cost around 16 €/ton CO 2 avoided and incremental cost of electricity of just over 1 €/MW h e.

[1]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO , 2004 .

[2]  Deuk Ki Lee,et al.  An apparent kinetic model for the carbonation of calcium oxide by carbon dioxide , 2004 .

[3]  T. Shimizu,et al.  A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO2 from combustion processes , 1999 .

[4]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Fluidized bed combustion systems integrating CO2 capture with CaO. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  A. Doukelis,et al.  Oxyfuel boiler design in a lignite-fired power plant , 2007 .

[6]  J. C. Abanades.  The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3 , 2002 .

[7]  E. Rubin,et al.  Sorbent Cost and Performance in CO2 Capture Systems , 2004 .

[8]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[9]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Enhancement of CaO for CO2 capture in an FBC environment , 2003 .

[10]  A. Doukelis,et al.  Economic implications of oxyfuel application in a lignite-fired power plant , 2007 .

[11]  Chunbo Wang,et al.  Carbonation of fly ash in oxy-fuel CFB combustion , 2008 .

[12]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Clean and efficient use of petroleum coke for combustion and power generation , 2004 .

[13]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Heat requirements in a calciner of CaCO3 integrated in a CO2 capture system using CaO , 2008 .

[14]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Conversion Limits in the Reaction of CO2 with Lime , 2003 .