An authentic learning based evaluation method for mobile learning in Higher Education

Abstract If mobile learning is to be effectively developed and feasibly applied to education, it is necessary to evaluate its effectiveness. This study adopted Herrington’s nine elements of authentic learning paradigm to develop an authentic learning-based evaluation method and design approach for m-learning activities. There were 84 participants in this experiment. The study was conducted from March through May 2015. After assessing the participants, we evaluated the results of the m-learning activity to illustrate the dimensions and criteria in the evaluation. The results show that there are three different groups of people concerned with different areas; students and professors mainly focus on authentic learning activities, learning strategies, and skills training. However, systems developers focus on function or service systems. The authors suggest that the third group, m-learning researchers and designers, must understand students’ views and needs so that m-learning development can provide better opportunities to practice authentic learning.

[1]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010 , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  L Calvi,et al.  Learning Biodiversity through Mobile Identification Keys: Design and Evaluation , 2009 .

[3]  John F. Cronin,et al.  Four Misconceptions about Authentic Learning. , 1993 .

[4]  David J. Weiss,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 2008 .

[5]  Jan Herrington,et al.  An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments , 2000 .

[6]  Kristine Peters,et al.  m-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future , 2007 .

[7]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Jan Herrington,et al.  The use of emerging technologies for authentic learning: A South African study in higher education , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  The development of a decision support system for mobile learning: a case study in Taiwan , 2016 .

[10]  Thomas Donald Cochrane,et al.  Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0 , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  Innovation in Mobile Learning: A European Perspective , 2009, Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn..

[12]  Trishita Mathew,et al.  Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: Student perceptions of Blackboard Mobile Learn and iPads , 2012 .

[13]  Mike Sharples,et al.  The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Dick Ng'ambi,et al.  Using Podcasting to Facilitate Student Learning: A Constructivist Perspective , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[15]  J. Traxler Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ . . . . , 2007 .

[16]  Norbert Pachler,et al.  Ubiquitous Mobility with Mobile Phones: A Cultural Ecology for Mobile Learning , 2011 .