Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with paradoxical embolism: procedural and follow-up results after implantation of the Amplatzer®-occluder device.

BACKGROUND Prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) with detectable right-to-left shunt is higher in young adults with transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke compared to the general population. So far, published series included different occluder systems, various indications and regimens of postprocedural anticoagulation. In our experience, occluder systems may be associated with an increased prevalence of thrombus formation, which has also reported by other groups. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the follow-up results after implantation of the Amplatzer® occluder in patients with PFO using a consistent anticoagulation regimen. METHODS AND RESULTS One-hundred and fourteen patients with PFO (60 men; age: 47 ± 13 years) and ≥1 thromboembolic event were included. Other causes for embolism were excluded. PFO-closure was successful in all patients. All patients were treated with aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for 6 months. TEE was repeated at a mean of 10.3 months. Mean clinical follow-up period was 18 ± 9 months. After a mean of 10 months, no patient had either a significant residual shunt nor a suspected thrombus formation on the occluder. During follow-up, 5 patients suffered from neurological events (1 stroke, 2 TIAs, 2 epileptic seizures), though complete closure of the PFO was documented by TEE. One patient suffered from bleeding complications (upper GI-bleeding). CONCLUSION Percutaneous closure of PFO in symptomatic patients by Amplatzer® occluder represents an effective therapy with a low incidence of peri-interventional complications and recurrent thromboembolism. Thrombus formations on the occluder system were not detected in this cohort.

[1]  R. Schnabel,et al.  Long term follow up after percutaneous closure of PFO in 357 patients with paradoxical embolism: Difference in occlusion systems and influence of atrial septum aneurysm. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  N. Wunderlich,et al.  Comparison of three patent foramen ovale closure devices in a randomized trial (Amplatzer versus CardioSEAL-STARflex versus Helex occluder). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  H. Drexler,et al.  Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism. Procedural and follow-up results after implantation of the Starflex occluder device with conjunctive intensified anticoagulation regimen. , 2008, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[4]  R. Bauer,et al.  Is surgical closure of patent foramen ovale the gold standard for treating interatrial shunts? An echocardiographic follow-up study. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  C. Nienaber,et al.  Interventional closure with Amplatzer PFO occluder of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical cerebral embolism. , 2005, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[6]  M. Schwerzmann,et al.  Transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm associated with patent foramen ovale for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism in high-risk patients. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Schwerzmann,et al.  Comparison of medical treatment with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  H. Reichmann,et al.  Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with paradoxical embolism. Periprocedural safety and mid-term follow-up results of three different device occluder systems. , 2004, European heart journal.

[9]  H. Sievert,et al.  Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1,000 consecutive patients. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Schwerzmann,et al.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: impact of device design on safety and efficacy , 2004, Heart.

[11]  J. Coste,et al.  Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  H. Sievert,et al.  Catheter closure of atrial septal defects and patent foramen ovale in patients with an atrial septal aneurysm using different devices. , 2001, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[13]  B Meier,et al.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism: long-term risk of recurrent thromboembolic events. , 2000, Circulation.

[14]  C. Mullany,et al.  Surgical patent foramen ovale closure for prevention of paradoxical embolism-related cerebrovascular ischemic events. , 1999, Circulation.

[15]  R. Sacco,et al.  Surgical closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke patients. , 1997, Stroke.

[16]  J. Bogousslavsky,et al.  Stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale , 1996, Neurology.

[17]  G. Plotnick,et al.  Patent foramen ovale: association between the degree of shunt by contrast transesophageal echocardiography and the risk of future ischemic neurologic events. , 1996, American heart journal.

[18]  W. Daniel,et al.  Identification of patent foramen ovale permitting paradoxic embolism. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  A. Keren,et al.  Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients. A multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. , 1995, Circulation.

[20]  W. Stewart,et al.  Patent Foramen Ovale and Brain Infarct: Echocardiographic Predictors, Recurrence, and Prevention , 1994, Stroke.

[21]  R. Sacco,et al.  Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale Associated With Cryptogenic Stroke: A Biplane Transesophageal Echocardiographic Study , 1994, Stroke.

[22]  F. Chédru,et al.  Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Patent Foramen Ovale as Risk Factors for Cryptogenic Stroke in Patients Less Than 55 Years of Age: A Study Using Transesophageal Echocardiography , 1993, Stroke.

[23]  J. Newburger,et al.  Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Presumed Paradoxical Embolism , 1992, Circulation.

[24]  R. Sacco,et al.  Patent Foramen Ovale as a Risk Factor for Cryptogenic Stroke , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  H. J. Smith,et al.  PATENT FORAMEN OVALE IN YOUNG STROKE PATIENTS , 1988, The Lancet.

[26]  P. Lechat,et al.  Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.