The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates.

BACKGROUND Control banding can be used as a first-tier assessment to control worker exposure to nano-objects and their aggregates and agglomerates (NOAA). In a second tier, more advanced modelling approaches are needed to produce quantitative exposure estimates. As currently no general quantitative nano-specific exposure models are available, this study evaluated the validity and applicability of using a generic exposure assessment model (the Advanced REACH Tool-ART) for occupational exposure to NOAA. METHOD The predictive capability of ART for occupational exposure to NOAA was tested by calculating the relative bias and correlations (Pearson) between the model estimates and measured concentrations using a dataset of 102 NOAA exposure measurements collected during experimental and workplace exposure studies. RESULTS Moderate to (very) strong correlations between the ART estimates and measured concentrations were found. Estimates correlated better to measured concentration levels of dust (r = 0.76, P < 0.01) than liquid aerosols (r = 0.51, P = 0.19). However, ART overestimated the measured NOAA concentrations for both the experimental and field measurements (factor 2-127). Overestimation was highest at low concentrations and decreased with increasing concentration. Correlations seemed to be better when looking at the nanomaterials individually compared to combined scenarios, indicating that nanomaterial-specific characteristics are not well captured within the mechanistic model of the ART. DISCUSSION Although ART in its current state is not capable to estimate occupational exposure to NOAA, the strong correlations for the individual nanomaterials indicate that the ART (and potentially other generic exposure models) have the potential to be extended or adapted for exposure to NOAA. In the future, studies investigating the potential to estimate exposure to NOAA should incorporate more explicitly nanomaterial-specific characteristics in their models.

[1]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Agglomerates and Aggregates Across Various Life Cycle Stages; A Broad-Scale Exposure Study. , 2015, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[3]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[4]  C. Warburton,et al.  A study of the performance and comparability of the sampling response to cotton dust of work area and personal sampling techniques. , 1992, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Reliability of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART). , 2014, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced Reach Tool (ART): development of the mechanistic model. , 2011, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  P. Swuste,et al.  Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures , 2009 .

[8]  T. Ogden,et al.  Dust from cotton manufacture: changing from static to personal sampling. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  Keld Alstrup Jensen,et al.  Worker Exposure and High Time-Resolution Analyses of Process-Related Submicrometre Particle Concentrations at Mixing Stations in Two Paint Factories. , 2015, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[10]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  A. Peters,et al.  Personal exposure to ultrafine particles: Two-level statistical modeling of background exposure and time-activity patterns during three seasons , 2016, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[12]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Assessment of Determinants of Emission Potentially Affecting the Concentration of Airborne Nano‐Objects and Their Agglomerates and Aggregates , 2017, Annals of work exposures and health.

[13]  A Pfahlberg,et al.  Respiratory symptoms and diseases among workers in the soft tissue producing industry , 2002, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[14]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[15]  P. Swuste,et al.  Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Validation of the inhalable dust algorithm of the Advanced REACH Tool using a dataset from the pharmaceutical industry. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.