Comparative techno-economic analysis of biomass fuelled combined heat and power for commercial buildings

The technical, environmental and economic analysis of two small scale biomass fuelled CHP applications is the subject of this study. For this analysis, the process simulation software ECLIPSE is used. Modelling and simulation have been conducted over two configurations: Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based and biomass gasification based systems for generating heat and electricity. The nominal power outputs of both systems are given at around 150kWe. Based on the results achieved, the key technical and environmental issues have been examined. The study also investigates the impact of different biomass feedstock on the performance of CHP systems. Finally, an economic evaluation of the system is performed. According to the ECLIPSE simulation, the overall efficiencies of the ORC based CHP system are around 76% when willow chip was used and around 81% with miscanthus. The difference was found to be due to the moisture content. For the biomass gasification based CHP system, the overall efficiencies of CHP were found to be around 58% with willow chip and 64% with miscanthus. These values are better than for any other biomass-fired electricity generation technologies of similar scale. On the other hand, the results of the economic analysis demonstrated that the breakeven electricity selling price (BESP) for the ORC-CHP systems varies from 40 to 50£/MWh and for the biomass gasification based CHP systems was between 87 and 97£/MWh. These values could be further improved if agricultural or forestry wastes could be used at lower costs.

[1]  Andreas Schuster,et al.  Energetic and economic investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle applications , 2009 .

[2]  B. C. Williams,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of fuel conversion and power generation systems — the development of a portable chemical process simulator with capital cost and economic performance analysis capabilities , 1996 .

[3]  François Maréchal,et al.  Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typification in the context of CO2 abatement part II: Combined heat and power cogeneration , 2010 .

[4]  L C Laurence,et al.  Syngas Treatment Unit for Small Scale Gasification - Application to IC Engine Gas Quality Requirement , 2012 .

[5]  S. Wood,et al.  A techno-economic analysis of small-scale, biomass-fuelled combined heat and power for community housing. , 2011 .

[6]  George Papadakis,et al.  Comparative thermodynamic study of refrigerants to select the best for use in the high-temperature stage of a two-stage organic Rankine cycle for RO desalination , 2009 .

[7]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of the use of CHP–ORC systems for small commercial buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass , 2011 .

[9]  Davide Tonini,et al.  LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark , 2012 .

[10]  Wojciech M. Budzianowski,et al.  Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs , 2012 .

[11]  Paul Upham,et al.  Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options , 2009 .

[12]  Paul Rowley,et al.  The feasibility of biomass CHP as an energy and CO2 source for commercial glasshouses , 2012 .

[13]  Jason T. McMullan,et al.  Wood-fired fuel cells in selected buildings , 2003 .

[14]  A. Sharma,et al.  Equilibrium modeling of global reduction reactions for a downdraft (biomass) gasifier , 2008 .

[15]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  Combined Heat and Power (CHP) essentials , 2007 .

[16]  Zhen Lu,et al.  Performance analysis and optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery , 2007 .

[17]  Shao Yingjuan,et al.  A biomass-fired micro-scale CHP system with organic Rankine cycle (ORC) – Thermodynamic modelling studies , 2011 .

[18]  Aacm Beenackers,et al.  Gasification technologies for heat and power from biomass , 1997 .

[19]  Ye Huang,et al.  Biomass Fuelled Trigeneration System in Selected Buildings , 2011 .

[20]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  The potential for Eucalyptus as a wood fuel in the UK , 2012 .

[21]  Neil Hewitt,et al.  A Techno-economic assessment of the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions through the use of biomass co-combustion , 2011 .

[22]  P. Mago,et al.  Performance analysis of different working fluids for use in organic Rankine cycles , 2007 .

[23]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Hybrid coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture: A technical and economic evaluation based on computational simulations , 2012 .

[24]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Development of small-scale and micro-scale biomass-fuelled CHP systems – A literature review , 2009 .

[25]  Sotirios Karellas,et al.  Supercritical Fluid Parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle Applications , 2008 .

[26]  Andrew P. Whitmore,et al.  Miscanthus, short-rotation coppice and the historic environment , 2009 .

[27]  Sibel Ozdogan,et al.  Results with a bench scale downdraft biomass gasifier for agricultural and forestry residues. , 2011 .

[28]  François Maréchal,et al.  Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typi!cation in the context of CO 2 abatement part I: Power generation , 2010 .

[29]  Jan Broeze,et al.  A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park , 2013 .

[30]  P. García-Bacaicoa,et al.  Gasification of biomass/high density polyethylene mixtures in a downdraft gasifier. , 2008, Bioresource technology.