Granger causality-based information fusion applied to electrical measurements from power transformers

Abstract In the immediate future, with the increasing presence of electrical vehicles and the large increase in the use of renewable energies, it will be crucial that distribution power networks are managed, supervised and exploited in a similar way as the transmission power systems were in previous decades. To achieve this, the underlying infrastructure requires automated monitoring and digitization, including smart-meters, wide-band communication systems, electronic device based-local controllers, and the Internet of Things. All of these technologies demand a huge amount of data to be curated, processed, interpreted and fused with the aim of real-time predictive control and supervision of medium/low voltage transformer substations. Wiener–Granger causality, a statistical notion of causal inference based on Information Fusion could help in the prediction of electrical behaviour arising from common causal dependencies. Originally developed in econometrics, it has successfully been applied to several fields of research such as the neurosciences and is applicable to time series data whereby cause precedes effect. In this paper, we demonstrate the potential of this methodology in the context of power measures for providing theoretical models of low/medium power transformers. Up to our knowledge, the proposed method in this context is the first attempt to build a data-driven power system model based on G-causality. In particular, we analysed directed functional connectivity of electrical measures providing a statistical description of observed responses, and identified the causal structure within data in an exploratory analysis. Pair-wise conditional G-causality of power transformers, their independent evolution in time, and the joint evolution in time and frequency are discussed and analysed in the experimental section.

[1]  Patrick L Purdon,et al.  A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective connectivity: Influence, causality and biophysical modeling , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Edwards Likelihood (Expanded Edition) , 1972 .

[5]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[6]  A. G. Expósito,et al.  Power system parameter estimation: a survey , 2000 .

[7]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[9]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[10]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[12]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  H Preißl,et al.  Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks , 1991 .

[14]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series , 1984 .

[15]  P. Mirowski,et al.  Statistical Machine Learning and Dissolved Gas Analysis: A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[16]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[17]  Juan Manuel Górriz,et al.  A new model for time-series forecasting using radial basis functions and exogenous data , 2004, Neural Computing & Applications.

[18]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[19]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Abdolrahman Peimankar,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective fault diagnosis of power transformers , 2017, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[22]  Antonio Gómez Expósito,et al.  A Multilevel State Estimation Paradigm for Smart Grids , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  A. Abur,et al.  Power system state estimation , 2004 .

[24]  Jennifer Vanessa Mejía Lara,et al.  Expert system for power transformer diagnosis , 2017, 2017 IEEE XXIV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON).

[25]  John R. Freeman Granger Causality and the Time Series Analysis of Political Relationships , 1983 .

[26]  Alard Roebroeck,et al.  Causal Time Series Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2009, NIPS Mini-Symposium on Causality in Time Series.

[27]  A. Seth,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.