Impact of the HITECH Act on physicians' adoption of electronic health records

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act has distributed billions of dollars to physicians as incentives for adopting certified electronic health records (EHRs) through the meaningful use (MU) program ultimately aimed at improving healthcare outcomes. The authors examine the extent to which the MU program impacted the EHR adoption curve that existed prior to the Act. METHODS Bass and Gamma Shifted Gompertz (G/SG) diffusion models of the adoption of "Any" and "Basic" EHR systems in physicians' offices using consistent data series covering 2001-2013 and 2006-2013, respectively, are estimated to determine if adoption was stimulated during either a PrePay (2009-2010) period of subsidy anticipation or a PostPay (2011-2013) period when payments were actually made. RESULTS Adoption of Any EHR system may have increased by as much as 7 percentage points above the level predicted in the absence of the MU subsidies. This estimate, however, lacks statistical significance and becomes smaller or negative under alternative model specifications. No substantial effects are found for Basic systems. The models suggest that adoption was largely driven by "imitation" effects (q-coefficient) as physicians mimic their peers' technology use or respond to mandates. Small and often insignificant "innovation" effects (p-coefficient) are found suggesting little enthusiasm by physicians who are leaders in technology adoption. CONCLUSION The authors find weak evidence of the impact of the MU program on EHR uptake. This is consistent with reports that many current EHR systems reduce physician productivity, lack data sharing capabilities, and need to incorporate other key interoperability features (e.g., application program interfaces).

[1]  Saurabh Rahurkar,et al.  Despite the spread of health information exchange, there is little evidence of its impact on cost, use, and quality of care. , 2015, Health affairs.

[2]  Bingyang Li,et al.  Investment Subsidies and the Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Hospitals , 2014, Journal of health economics.

[3]  Cleo A. Samuel,et al.  Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  et al.,et al.  How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Ranjit Singh,et al.  Professional and geographical network effects on healthcare information exchange growth: does proximity really matter? , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  The Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program: provider performance on core and menu measures. , 2014, Health services research.

[7]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. , 2014, NCHS data brief.

[8]  M. Millenson The long wait for medical excellence. , 2013, Health affairs.

[9]  Jodi G. Daniel,et al.  E-prescribing adoption and use increased substantially following the start of a federal incentive program. , 2013, Health affairs.

[10]  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin,et al.  Forecasting the use of electronic health records: an expert opinion approach. , 2013, Medicare & medicaid research review.

[11]  Spooner Sa,et al.  We Are Still Waiting for Fully Supportive Electronic Health Records in Pediatrics , 2012 .

[12]  S Andrew Spooner,et al.  We Are Still Waiting for Fully Supportive Electronic Health Records in Pediatrics , 2012, Pediatrics.

[13]  Eric W. Jamoom,et al.  Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. , 2012, Health affairs.

[14]  L. Casalino,et al.  Small and medium-size physician practices use few patient-centered medical home processes. , 2011, Health affairs.

[15]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Florida doctors seeing Medicaid patients show broad interest in federal incentives for adopting electronic health records. , 2011, Health affairs.

[16]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[17]  M. Burke,et al.  More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives. , 2011, Health affairs.

[18]  Farzad Mostashari,et al.  The Regional Extension Center Program: Helping Physicians Meaningfully Use Health Information Technology , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Amir Sufi,et al.  The Effects of Fiscal Stimulus: Evidence from the 2009 &Apos;Cash for Clunkers&Apos; Program , 2010 .

[20]  Eric W. Ford,et al.  Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[21]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  A Critical Review of Marketing Research on Diffusion of New Products , 2007 .

[22]  Eric W. Ford,et al.  Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless? , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[23]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[24]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[25]  Albert C. BemmaorJanghyuk Lee,et al.  Research Note The Impact of Heterogeneity and Ill-Conditioning on Diffusion Model Parameter Estimates , 2002 .

[26]  T. Norris The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Revised Edition , 1998, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[27]  G. Lilien,et al.  Bias and Systematic Change in the Parameter Estimates of Macro-Level Diffusion Models , 1997 .

[28]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Diffusion of New Products: Empirical Generalizations and Managerial Uses , 1995 .

[29]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  Why the Bass Model Fits without Decision Variables , 1994 .

[30]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Chapter 8 New-product diffusion models , 1993, Marketing.

[31]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models , 1990 .