Distribution characteristics, reproducibility, and precision of region of interest-based hippocampal diffusion tensor imaging measures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE For adequate interpretation of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters empirical distribution characteristics, precision, and reproducibility should be known. The present study investigated distribution and reliability parameters of hippocampal fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). METHODS FA and MD values were averaged in hippocampal regions of interest in 20 subjects (10 women and 10 men; age range, 25-69 years). Regions of interest were manually placed bilaterally by one investigator at 2 occasions, and by a second independent investigator. Sample distributions of FA and MD values were compared with normal distributions. Intraclass coefficients (ICCs), standard errors of measurement (SEMs), and coefficients of variation (CVs) with confidence intervals (CI95s) were computed. RESULTS The results did not show any deviation of averaged FA (0.237 +/- 0.017) and MD (775 +/- 28 microm2/s) values from normal distribution. Intraobserver reliability (ICC > or = 0.90) and precision (CV < or = 3.5%) were high for all measures. Interobserver reliability reached values of ICC > or = 0.84 and CV < or = 4.1%. FA yielded lower precision (CV 2.2-4.1%) than MD (CV 1.3-2.5%), CI95s were around +/-0.015-0.020 and +/-25-30 microm2/s for FA and MD, respectively. FA differences of 0.020-0.030 and MD differences of 40-50 microm2/s can be assumed to reflect reliably distinct values in hippocampal regions. CONCLUSION The results are in line with previous reports on reliability of DTI measures by using different designs and methodology. Notwithstanding the difficulties associated with region of interest-derived DTI measurements in hippocampal regions, the present approach provides estimates of distribution characteristics and precision applicable to routine assessments of DTI parameters in clinical and research context.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Measurement error and correlation coefficients , 1996, BMJ.

[2]  Matthias J. Müller,et al.  Effects of Interrater Reliability of Psychopathologic Assessment on Power and Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Trials , 2002, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[3]  R I Grossman,et al.  Microscopic disease in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images in patients with multiple sclerosis: assessment with magnetization-transfer measurements. , 1995, Radiology.

[4]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  New approaches for exploring anatomical and functional connectivity in the human brain , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  P. Basser,et al.  Statistical artifacts in diffusion tensor MRI (DT‐MRI) caused by background noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Edelman,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Alzheimer’s Disease , 1999, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[7]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Volumetry and diffusion tensor imaging of hippocampal subregions in schizophrenia , 2004, Neuroreport.

[8]  G. Comi,et al.  Mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy histograms of patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  Tests for departure from normality. Empirical results for the distributions of b2 and √b1 , 1973 .

[10]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Measurement error proportional to the mean , 1996, BMJ.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: The normal distribution , 1995, BMJ.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Measurement error , 1996 .

[13]  Ralph B. D'Agostino,et al.  Tests for Departure from Normality , 1973 .

[14]  Scott H Faro,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the hippocampal formation in temporal lobe epilepsy. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  P. C. de Freitas Mathias,et al.  Insulin Secretion and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Monosodium L-Glutamate-Induced Obese Mice , 2001, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[16]  P. Royston Tests for Departure from Normality , 1992 .

[17]  M Filippi,et al.  A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS , 2000, Neurology.

[18]  L Fahrmeir,et al.  Assessing DTI data quality using bootstrap analysis , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. J. Allen Introduction to Measurement Theory , 1979 .

[20]  Matthias J. Müller,et al.  Ultrastructural Hippocampal and White Matter Alterations in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study , 2004, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[21]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Ralph B. D'Agostino,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit-Techniques , 2020 .

[23]  M. I. Smith,et al.  A study of rotationally invariant and symmetric indices of diffusion anisotropy. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  A. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Replicability of diffusion tensor imaging measurements of fractional anisotropy and trace in brain , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  P. Basser,et al.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. , 1996, Radiology.

[26]  John S. Duncan,et al.  Noninvasive in vivo demonstration of the connections of the human parahippocampal gyrus , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  P. Shrout Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[28]  Ross E. Traub,et al.  Reliability for the Social Sciences: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[29]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[30]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  From diffusion tractography to quantitative white matter tract measures: a reproducibility study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[31]  Peter J. Basser,et al.  A normal distribution for tensor-valued random variables: applications to diffusion tensor MRI , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  D. Altman,et al.  Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.