Using Near-Ground Storm Relative Helicity in Supercell Tornado Forecasting

This study examines the possibility that supercell tornado forecasts could be improved by utilizing the storm-relative helicity (SRH) in the lowest few hundred meters of the atmosphere (instead of much deeper layers). This hypothesis emerges from a growing body of literature linking the near-ground wind profile to the organization of the low-level mesocyclone and thus the probability of tornadogenesis. This study further addresses the ramifications of near-ground SRH to the skill of the significant tornado parameter (STP), which is probably the most commonly used environmental indicator for tornadic thunderstorms. Using a sample of 20 194 severe, right-moving supercells spanning a 13-yr period, sounding-derived parameters were compared using forecast verification metrics, emphasizing a high probability of detection for tornadic supercells while minimizing false alarms. This climatology reveals that the kinematic components of environmental profiles are more skillful at discriminating significantly tornadic supercells from severe, nontornadic supercells than the thermodynamic components. The effective-layer SRH has by far the greatest forecast skill among the components of the STP, as it is currently defined. However, using progressively shallower layers for the SRH calculation leads to increasing forecast skill. Replacing the effective-layer SRH with the 0–500 m AGL SRH in the formulation of STP increases the number of correctly predicted events by 8% and decreases the number of missed events and false alarms by 18%. These results provide promising evidence that forecast parameters can still be improved through increased understanding of the environmental controls on the processes that govern tornado formation.

[1]  Robert Davies-Jones,et al.  Streamwise Vorticity: The Origin of Updraft Rotation in Supercell Storms , 1984 .

[2]  C. Doswell,et al.  On Summary Measures of Skill in Rare Event Forecasting Based on Contingency Tables , 1990 .

[3]  R. Johns,et al.  Severe Local Storms Forecasting , 1992 .

[4]  Erik N. Rasmussen,et al.  The Occurrence of Tornadoes in Supercells Interacting with Boundaries during VORTEX-95 , 1998 .

[5]  E. Rasmussen,et al.  A Baseline Climatology of Sounding-Derived Supercell and Tornado Forecast Parameters , 1998 .

[6]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Predicting Supercell Motion Using a New Hodograph Technique , 2000 .

[7]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak , 2000 .

[8]  Harold E. Brooks,et al.  16.3 BASELINE CLIMATOLOGY OF SOUNDING DERIVED PARAMETERS ASSOCIATED WITH DEEP, MOIST CONVECTION , 2002 .

[9]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Close Proximity Soundings within Supercell Environments Obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle , 2003 .

[10]  J. Wyngaard,et al.  Resolution Requirements for the Simulation of Deep Moist Convection , 2003 .

[11]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Characteristics of Vertical Wind Profiles near Supercells Obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle , 2003 .

[12]  Erik N. Rasmussen,et al.  Refined Supercell and Tornado Forecast Parameters , 2003 .

[13]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  Shear Parameter Thresholds for Forecasting Tornadic Thunderstorms in Northern and Central California , 2003 .

[14]  Jonathan M. Davies,et al.  Estimations of CIN and LFC Associated with Tornadic and Nontornadic Supercells , 2004 .

[15]  Barry E. Schwartz,et al.  An Hourly Assimilation–Forecast Cycle: The RUC , 2004 .

[16]  J. Caruso.  Tornadoes in Nonmesocyclone Environments with Pre-existing Vertical Vorticity along Convergence Boundaries , 2005 .

[17]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Effective Storm-Relative Helicity and Bulk Shear in Supercell Thunderstorm Environments , 2007 .

[18]  Paul J. Roebber,et al.  Visualizing Multiple Measures of Forecast Quality , 2009 .

[19]  K. Elmore,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Proximity Sounding Criteria on the Climatology of Significant Tornado Environments , 2010 .

[20]  P. Markowski,et al.  The Characteristics of Numerically Simulated Supercell Storms Situated over Statically Stable Boundary Layers , 2011 .

[21]  Andrew R. Dean,et al.  Conditional Probability Estimation for Significant Tornadoes Based on Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) Profiles , 2011 .

[22]  Erik N. Rasmussen,et al.  The Second Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment: VORTEX2 , 2012 .

[23]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Convective Modes for Significant Severe Thunderstorms in the Contiguous United States. Part I: Storm Classification and Climatology , 2012 .

[24]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Convective Modes for Significant Severe Thunderstorms in the Contiguous United States. Part II: Supercell and QLCS Tornado Environments , 2012 .

[25]  M. Coniglio.  Verification of RUC 0-1-h Forecasts and SPC Mesoscale Analyses Using VORTEX2 Soundings , 2012 .

[26]  Anders A. Jensen,et al.  Classifying Proximity Soundings with Self-Organizing Maps toward Improving Supercell and Tornado Forecasting , 2013 .

[27]  Brice E. Coffer,et al.  Sensitivity of 24-h Forecast Dryline Position and Structure to Boundary Layer Parameterizations in Convection-Allowing WRF Model Simulations , 2013 .

[28]  James Correia,et al.  Verification of Convection-Allowing WRF Model Forecasts of the Planetary Boundary Layer Using Sounding Observations , 2013 .

[29]  M. Parker.  Composite VORTEX2 Supercell Environments from Near-Storm Soundings , 2014 .

[30]  Christopher J. Schultz,et al.  Meteorological Overview of the Devastating 27 April 2011 Tornado Outbreak , 2014 .

[31]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Choosing a Universal Mean Wind for Supercell Motion Prediction , 2014 .

[32]  Christopher Macintosh.  The 6 May 2010 Elevated Supercell During VORTEX2 , 2014 .

[33]  M. Parker,et al.  Climatology and Ingredients of Significant Severe Convection in High-Shear, Low-CAPE Environments , 2014 .

[34]  Patrick T. Marsh,et al.  Diagnosing the Conditional Probability of Tornado Damage Rating Using Environmental and Radar Attributes , 2015 .

[35]  Brice E. Coffer,et al.  Impacts of Increasing Low-Level Shear on Supercells during the Early Evening Transition* , 2015 .

[36]  Ariel E. Cohen,et al.  A Review of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes and Their Sensitivity in Simulating Southeastern U.S. Cold Season Severe Weather Environments , 2015 .

[37]  G. Grell,et al.  A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh , 2016 .

[38]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Investigation of Near-Storm Environments for Tornado Events and Warnings , 2016 .

[39]  Ariel E. Cohen,et al.  The Challenge of Forecasting Significant Tornadoes from June to October Using Convective Parameters , 2016 .

[40]  Brice E. Coffer,et al.  Simulated Supercells in Nontornadic and Tornadic VORTEX2 Environments , 2017 .

[41]  Matthew J. Bunkers.  Observations of Right-Moving Supercell Motion Forecast Errors , 2017 .

[42]  Adam J. Clark,et al.  Volatility of Tornadogenesis: An Ensemble of Simulated Nontornadic and Tornadic Supercells in VORTEX2 Environments , 2017 .

[43]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  SHARPpy: An Open-Source Sounding Analysis Toolkit for the Atmospheric Sciences , 2017 .

[44]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps for the Investigation of Tornadic Near-Storm Environments , 2017 .

[45]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Tornado Damage Rating Probabilities Derived from WSR-88D Data , 2017 .

[46]  Brice E. Coffer,et al.  Is There a “Tipping Point” between Simulated Nontornadic and Tornadic Supercells in VORTEX2 Environments? , 2018, Monthly Weather Review.

[47]  Michael C. Coniglio,et al.  Comparison of Near- and Far-Field Supercell Inflow Environments Using Radiosonde Observations , 2018, Monthly Weather Review.

[48]  Nws,et al.  Relationship of Low-Level Instability and Tornado Damage Rating Based on Observed Soundings , 2018 .