Public employment agencies and unemployment spells: reconciling the experimental and non-experimental evidence

Econometric evidence strongly suggests that unemployed job-seekers who use the services of a Public Employment Agency (PEA) have longer unemployment spells than those choosing alternative search methods. Yet, in some well-designed U.S. experiments, increased use of PEA services has been associated with faster transitions into jobs. The author argues that the nonexperimental studies may be biased toward finding a positive relationship between unemployment spell duration and PEA use because they ignore the possibility that PEAs are chosen by many job-seekers only after other search methods have been tried unsuccessfully and a period of unemployment has elapsed. An analysis of U.K. survey data with information on the timing of PEA use in 1987–88 supports that hypothesis.

[1]  Jonathan M. Thomas.  An Empirical Model of Sectoral Movements by Unemployed Workers , 1996, Journal of Labor Economics.

[2]  Mark B. Stewart,et al.  THE DETERMINANTS OF INDIVIDUAL UNEMPLOYMENT DURATIONS IN AN ERA OF HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT , 1995 .

[3]  J. Ours.  Matching unemployed and vacancies at the public employment office , 1994 .

[4]  Jonathan M. Thomas.  On testing the logistic assumption in binary dependent variable models , 1993 .

[5]  L. Osberg.  Fishing in Different Pools: Job-Search Strategies and Job-Finding Success in Canada in the Early 1980s , 1993, Journal of Labor Economics.

[6]  Philip K. Robins,et al.  Job Search Outcomes for the Employed and Unemployed , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  David Card,et al.  Recent Trends in Insured and Uninsured Unemployment: is There an Explanation? , 1989 .

[8]  S. Roper.  Recruitment Methods and Vacancy Duration , 1988 .

[9]  John B. Wielgosz,et al.  The Effectiveness of Alternative Methods of Searching for Jobs and Finding Them: An Exploratory Analysis of the Data Bearing upon the Ways of Coping with joblessness , 1987 .

[10]  Harry J. Holzer,et al.  Search Method Use by Unemployed Youth , 1986, Journal of Labor Economics.

[11]  H. Holzer,et al.  Informal Job Search and Black Youth Unemployment , 1986 .

[12]  Philip K. Robins,et al.  Government Programs, Job Search Requirements, and the Duration of Unemployment , 1985, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  R. Lalonde.  Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data , 1984 .

[14]  James G. MacKinnon,et al.  Convenient Specification Tests for Logit and Probit Models , 1984 .

[15]  J. Heckman,et al.  A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data , 1984 .

[16]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Estimating the Probability of Leaving Unemployment , 1979 .

[17]  Bruce D. Meyer.  Lessons from the U.S. Unemployment Insurance Experiments , 1995 .

[18]  Terry R. Johnson,et al.  Experimental Evidence on Unemployment Insurance Work-Search Policies , 1994 .

[19]  W. Narendranathan,et al.  Job Search In A Dynamic Environment An Empirical Analysis , 1993 .

[20]  Katharine G. Abraham,et al.  Improving Job Matches in the U.S. Labor Market , 1993 .

[21]  J. C. van Ours,et al.  Matching employers and workers : An empirical analysis on the effectiveness of search , 1991 .

[22]  D. Bosworth.  Unemployment and the Intensity and Method of Job Search , 1990 .

[23]  J. Micklewright.  Why Do Less Than a Quarter of the Unemployed in Britain Receive Unemployment Insurance , 1990 .

[24]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[25]  W. W. Daniel.  A national survey of the unemployed , 1974 .